Literature DB >> 12684970

Structure and function of the temporomandibular joint disc: implications for tissue engineering.

Michael S Detamore1, Kyriacos A Athanasiou.   

Abstract

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc is a little understood structure that, unfortunately, exhibits a plethora of pathologic disorders. Tissue engineering approaches may be warranted to address TMJ disc pathophysiology, but first a clear understanding of structure-function relationships needs to be developed, especially as they relate to the regenerative potential of the tissue. In this review, we correlate the biochemical content of the TMJ disc to its mechanical behavior and discuss what this correlation infers for tissue engineering studies of the TMJ disc. The disc of the TMJ exhibits a somewhat biconcave shape, being thicker in the anterior and posterior bands and thinner in the intermediate zone. The disc, which is certainly an anisotropic and nonhomogeneous tissue, consists almost entirely of type I collagen with trace amounts of type II and other types. In general, collagen fibers in the intermediate zone appear to run primarily in an anteroposterior direction and in a ringlike fashion around the periphery. Collagen orientation is reflected in higher tensile stiffness and strength in the center anteroposteriorly than mediolaterally and in the anterior and posterior bands than the intermediate zone mediolaterally. Tensile tests have shown the disc is stiffer and stronger in the direction of the collagen fibers. Elastin fibers in general appear along the collagen fibers and most likely function in restoring and retaining disc form after loading. The 2 primary glycosaminoglycans of the disc by far are chondroitin sulfate and dermatan sulfate, although their distribution is not clear. Compression studies are conflicting, but evidence suggests the disc is compressively stiffest in the center. Only a few tissue engineering studies of the TMJ disc have been performed to date. Tissue engineering studies must take advantage of existing information for experimental design and construct validation, and more research is necessary to characterize the disc to create a clearer picture of our goals in tissue engineering the TMJ disc. Copyright 2003 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:494-506, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12684970     DOI: 10.1053/joms.2003.50096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  32 in total

1.  Anisotropic solute diffusion tensor in porcine TMJ discs measured by FRAP with spatial Fourier analysis.

Authors:  Changcheng Shi; Jonathan Kuo; P Darwin Bell; Hai Yao
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  An interspecies comparison of the temporomandibular joint disc.

Authors:  K N Kalpakci; V P Willard; M E Wong; K A Athanasiou
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Embryological study of the development of the rat temporomandibular joint: highlighting the development of the glenoid fossa.

Authors:  Yuji Yamaki; Kohzo Tsuchikawa; Takako Nagasawa; Kazuhiko Hiroyasu
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Cell type and distribution in the porcine temporomandibular joint disc.

Authors:  Michael S Detamore; Jay N Hegde; Rohan R Wagle; Alejandro J Almarza; Dina Montufar-Solis; P Jackie Duke; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 5.  Extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for functional tissue reconstruction.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.012

6.  Considerations for translation of tissue engineered fibrocartilage from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Ryan P Donahue; Erik A Gonzalez-Leon; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos Athanasiou
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  The effects of oxygen level and glucose concentration on the metabolism of porcine TMJ disc cells.

Authors:  S E Cisewski; L Zhang; J Kuo; G J Wright; Y Wu; M J Kern; H Yao
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Inductive, scaffold-based, regenerative medicine approach to reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint disk.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; William L Chung; Alejandro J Almarza; Matthew D Pavlick; Serafim N Reppas; Mark W Ochs; Alan J Russell; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Biomechanical strain regulates TNFR2 but not TNFR1 in TMJ cells.

Authors:  James Deschner; Birgit Rath-Deschner; Ewa Wypasek; Mirela Anghelina; Danen Sjostrom; Sudha Agarwal
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Quantitative analysis and comparative regional investigation of the extracellular matrix of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc.

Authors:  Michael S Detamore; John G Orfanos; Alejandro J Almarza; Margaret M French; Mark E Wong; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.