Literature DB >> 12684204

Hemispheric differences in semantic-relatedness judgments.

Rolf A Zwaan1, Richard H Yaxley.   

Abstract

Subjects judged the semantic relatedness of word pairs presented to the left or right visual field. The word pairs were presented one below the other. On critical trials, the words' referents had a typical spatial relation, with one referent oriented above the other (e.g. ATTIC/BASEMENT). The spatial relation of the words either matched or mismatched the spatial relation of their referents. When presented to the left hemisphere, the match or mismatch did not have an effect. However, there was a reliable mismatch effect for pairs presented to the right hemisphere. The results are interpreted in the context of perceptual theories of mental representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12684204     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00235-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  3 in total

1.  The mechanism of valence-space metaphors: ERP evidence for affective word processing.

Authors:  Jiushu Xie; Ruiming Wang; Song Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Chinese Children with Congenital and Acquired Blindness Represent Concrete Concepts in Vertical Space through Tactile Perception.

Authors:  Guangyin Shen; Ruiming Wang; Mengru Yang; Jiushu Xie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Interplay Between the Object and Its Symbol: The Size-Congruency Effect.

Authors:  Manqiong Shen; Jiushu Xie; Wenjuan Liu; Wenjie Lin; Zhuoming Chen; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos; Ruiming Wang
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-06-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.