Literature DB >> 12683456

Outcomes after mutilating hand injuries: review of the literature and recommendations for assessment.

Reuben A Bueno1, Michael W Neumeister.   

Abstract

The functional outcome of a mutilating hand injury cannot be fully assessed at the time of injury alone. The measure of functional outcome must incorporate the evaluation and severity of the initial injury and the subsequent reconstructive surgeries. The complexity of the hand deserves no less. Restoration of prehensile function is the top priority in reconstruction following mutilating hand injuries, and assessment of outcome should address this goal. Flaps and specialized tissue grafts can restore architecture and balance in the hand. One can reconstruct a thumb and fingers with the big toe and smaller toes to give a functional sensate grip. The assessment of functional outcome should include not only objective measures but also subjective questionnaires that focus on issues most relevant to the patient. The use of questionnaires that have been shown to be valid, reliable, consistent, responsive, and sensitive allows the most meaningful conclusions about and comparisons between treatments. Perhaps because of the unique challenges presented by mutilating hand injuries, a new instrument, specific to mutilating hand injury, may provide the most beneficial information to guide treatment and assess outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12683456     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-0712(02)00142-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand Clin        ISSN: 0749-0712            Impact factor:   1.907


  8 in total

1.  The reconstruction of the mutilated hand.

Authors:  Michael Neumeister; Thersa Hegge; Ashley Amalfi; Michael Sauerbier
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Principles of tendon reconstruction following complex trauma of the upper limb.

Authors:  Arhana Chattopadhyay; Rory McGoldrick; Elise Umansky; James Chang
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 3.  Current management of the mangled upper extremity.

Authors:  Marko Bumbasirevic; Milan Stevanovic; Aleksandar Lesic; Henry D E Atkinson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Correlation of HISS and Strickland Score with the Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire in hand injuries.

Authors:  Anil K Bhat; A M Acharya; Deepankar Mishra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-06-17

5.  Outcome and clinical changes in patients 3, 6, 12 months after a severe or major hand injury--can sense of coherence be an indicator for rehabilitation focus?

Authors:  Ragnhild I Cederlund; Eva Ramel; Hans-Eric Rosberg; Lars B Dahlin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Principles in the management of a mangled hand.

Authors:  Chong Ks Alphonsus
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05

7.  The development and future of reconstructive and microvascular surgery of the hand.

Authors:  Marco Malahias; Daniel J Jordan; Sandip Hindocha; Wasim Khan; Ali Juma
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-10-31

8.  Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation.

Authors:  G Mattiassich; F Rittenschober; L Dorninger; J Rois; R Mittermayr; R Ortmaier; M Ponschab; K Katzensteiner; L Larcher
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.