Literature DB >> 12682200

Preoperative evaluation of the entire hepatic vasculature in living liver donors with use of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and true fast imaging with steady-state precession.

James C Carr1, Albert A Nemcek, Michael Abecassis, Andrew Blei, Lori Clarke, F Scott Pereles, Richard McCarthy, J Paul Finn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To preoperatively assess the entire hepatic vasculature in living related liver donors with use of a combination of contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five living potential liver donors were examined preoperatively on a 1.5T Siemens Sonata system. Twenty-four underwent surgery and two had catheter angiography performed to delineate complex anatomy. Contiguous 5-mm-thick, sub-second true FISP images of the liver were initially obtained during breath-holding in axial and coronal planes (repetition time [TR]/echo time [TE], 3.2/1.6; flip angle, 70 degrees ). MR angiography was performed with use of a three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) pulse sequence (TR/TE, 3.0/1.2; flip angle, 25 degrees ), with 40 mL of Gadolinium DTPA injected at a rate of 2 mL/sec. One precontrast and two postcontrast coronal 3D volumes were acquired, each in a 20-second breath-hold, and two subtracted 3D sets were calculated. Arterial anatomy was assessed with use of maximum-intensity projection, volume rendering, and multiplanar reformatting algorithms. Hepatic and portal venous anatomy was evaluated with use of the true FISP images and the venous phase of the MR angiogram. Visualization of hepatic arterial branches was noted. Visualization of portal vein branches was scored on a scale of 0-5. The presence of anatomic variants was noted. Vascular anatomy was confirmed at the time of surgery and at catheter angiography.
RESULTS: Segmental branch vessels were visualized on MR angiography in the majority of cases. The segment four branch was identified in 96% patients. Variant arterial anatomy was seen in 50% of patients. MR angiography detected 10 of 11 arterial variants found at surgery and angiography. Visualization of portal vein branches was generally higher with true FISP compared to MR angiography. Twenty-four percent of patients had variant portal venous anatomy. Caudal hepatic veins were identified in 60% of patients, of which eight were significant (>5 mm). Hepatic and portal venous anatomy was accurately predicted by true FISP and MR angiography in all patients who went on to undergo surgery.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative imaging with use of a combination of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and true FISP provides a comprehensive assessment of the entire hepatic vasculature in living liver donors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12682200     DOI: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000064853.87207.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of real-time 3D visualization for cardiothoracic diagnostic evaluation and surgery planning.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger; Paul L Molina; Thomas M Egan; Frank C Detterbeck; Keith E Muller; Christopher S Coffey; Joseph K T Lee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Prospective intraindividual comparison between respiratory-triggered balanced steady-state free precession and breath-hold gradient-echo and time-of-flight magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of portal and hepatic veins.

Authors:  Jürgen K Willmann; Kerstin Göpfert; Amelie M Lutz; Daniel Nanz; Lucas McCormack; Henrik Petrowsky; Burkhardt Seifert; Patrice Hervo; Borut Marincek; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  CT virtual endoscopy for analyzing variations in the hepatic portal vein.

Authors:  Guodong Pang; Guangrui Shao; Fang Zhao; Cheng Liu; Hai Zhong; Weihua Guo
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Anatomical variations of the hepatic artery: study of 932 cases in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Siraj Saadaldin Abdullah; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Vincent Garbit; Eric De La Roche; Eric Olagne; Agnès Rode; André Morin; Yves Berthezene; Jacques Baulieux; Christian Ducerf
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Preoperative evaluation of hepatic arterial and portal venous anatomy using the time resolved echo-shared MR angiographic technique in living liver donors.

Authors:  Min Woo Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Jae Young Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Eun-Ah Park; Joon Koo Han; Jin-Young Choi; Young Jun Kim; Kyung-Suk Suh; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  "Renal emergencies: a comprehensive pictorial review with MR imaging".

Authors:  Dheeraj Reddy Gopireddy; Hagar Mahmoud; Saif Baig; Rebecca Le; Priya Bhosale; Chandana Lall
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2020-09-25

7.  A critical evaluation of hepatic resection in cirrhosis: optimizing patient selection and outcomes.

Authors:  Jean C Emond; Benjamin Samstein; John F Renz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Radial sliding-window magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with highly-constrained projection reconstruction (HYPR).

Authors:  Hyun J Jeong; Ty A Cashen; Michael C Hurley; Christopher Eddleman; Christopher Getch; H Hunt Batjer; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Assessment of deep venous thrombosis in the lower extremity in Behçet's syndrome: MR venography versus Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  Burcin Tutar; Fatih Kantarci; Osman Serdal Cakmak; Hasan Yazici; Emire Seyahi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  Short-term clinical implications of the accessory left hepatic artery in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Qi-Yue Chen; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.