OBJECTIVE: To assist efforts to improve adult vaccination coverage by characterizing vaccination and infectious disease screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists. METHODS: A written survey of demographics, attitudes, and practices was mailed to 1063 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows, including the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (n = 413) and 650 randomly sampled Fellows. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members and 44% of nonmembers responded. A majority (Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members: 60%; nonmembers: 49%) considered themselves primary care providers. Fewer than 60% routinely obtained patient vaccination or infection histories. Most screened prenatal patients for hepatitis B surface antigen (89%) and rubella immunoglobulin G antibody (85%). Sixty-four percent worked in practices that offered at least one vaccine; the most common were rubella (52%) and influenza (50%). Ten percent worked in practices that offered all major vaccines recommended for pregnant or postpartum women. Despite recommendations to provide influenza vaccine to pregnant women during influenza season, only 44% did so; among those who did not, 14% reported a belief that pregnant women do not need influenza vaccine. Provision of vaccine was associated with working in a multispecialty practice (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 4.1) and identifying as a primary care provider (adjusted OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3, 2.7). The most common reasons for not offering vaccines were cost (44%) and a belief that vaccines should be provided elsewhere (41%). CONCLUSION: The high proportion of obstetrician-gynecologists who do not offer vaccines or screen for vaccine and infection histories suggests missed opportunities for prevention of maternal and neonatal infections.
OBJECTIVE: To assist efforts to improve adult vaccination coverage by characterizing vaccination and infectious disease screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists. METHODS: A written survey of demographics, attitudes, and practices was mailed to 1063 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows, including the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (n = 413) and 650 randomly sampled Fellows. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members and 44% of nonmembers responded. A majority (Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network members: 60%; nonmembers: 49%) considered themselves primary care providers. Fewer than 60% routinely obtained patient vaccination or infection histories. Most screened prenatal patients for hepatitis B surface antigen (89%) and rubella immunoglobulin G antibody (85%). Sixty-four percent worked in practices that offered at least one vaccine; the most common were rubella (52%) and influenza (50%). Ten percent worked in practices that offered all major vaccines recommended for pregnant or postpartum women. Despite recommendations to provide influenza vaccine to pregnant women during influenza season, only 44% did so; among those who did not, 14% reported a belief that pregnant women do not need influenza vaccine. Provision of vaccine was associated with working in a multispecialty practice (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 4.1) and identifying as a primary care provider (adjusted OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.3, 2.7). The most common reasons for not offering vaccines were cost (44%) and a belief that vaccines should be provided elsewhere (41%). CONCLUSION: The high proportion of obstetrician-gynecologists who do not offer vaccines or screen for vaccine and infection histories suggests missed opportunities for prevention of maternal and neonatal infections.
Authors: Katherine A Poehling; Peter G Szilagyi; Mary A Staat; Beverly M Snively; Daniel C Payne; Carolyn B Bridges; Susan Y Chu; Laney S Light; Mila M Prill; Lyn Finelli; Marie R Griffin; Kathryn M Edwards Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Beth M Isaac; Jane R Zucker; Francesca R Giancotti; Emily Abernathy; Joseph Icenogle; Jennifer L Rakeman; Jennifer B Rosen Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2017-09-05
Authors: D MacDougall; B A Halperin; D MacKinnon-Cameron; L Li; S A McNeil; J M Langley; S A Halperin Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Parth D Shah; Melissa B Gilkey; Jessica K Pepper; Sami L Gottlieb; Noel T Brewer Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 5.217
Authors: Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth Mitchell Armstrong; Lisa H Harris; Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann; Margaret Olivia Little Journal: Hastings Cent Rep Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.683