BACKGROUND: Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a widely recognized precancerous lesion of the lip. Varying degrees of epithelial dysplasia may be present. However, no studies have correlated epithelial changes with cytokeratin expression that might reflect the disordered maturation that is probably occurring. METHODS: Thirty-four cases diagnosed as AC were classified according to dysplasia degree, and submitted to immunohistochemical staining for the detection of cytokeratins (CKs) 7, 8, 13, 14, 16 and 19. Normal mucosa adjacent to the lesions was also evaluated. RESULTS: The results obtained showed that CK10 immunostained only superficial keratinized epithelial layers in 11 cases, and also intermediate spinous layers in 18 cases. Cytokeratin 14 was expressed in all epithelial layers of 31 cases, in two cases its expression was in the basal and intermediate layers, and one case was negative. Cytokeratin 13 immunostained 26 cases and was negative in eight cases. In these eight cases, CK13 was apparently replaced by CK16. Cytokeratin 16, besides these eight cases, was also expressed in the spinous intermediate layers of a further eight cases. The remaining CKs tested were all negative. No relation between the degree of dysplasia and the CK expression was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Cytokeratin expression in AC is different from that of normal oral mucosa, and is not related to the degree of dysplasia.
BACKGROUND:Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a widely recognized precancerous lesion of the lip. Varying degrees of epithelial dysplasia may be present. However, no studies have correlated epithelial changes with cytokeratin expression that might reflect the disordered maturation that is probably occurring. METHODS: Thirty-four cases diagnosed as AC were classified according to dysplasia degree, and submitted to immunohistochemical staining for the detection of cytokeratins (CKs) 7, 8, 13, 14, 16 and 19. Normal mucosa adjacent to the lesions was also evaluated. RESULTS: The results obtained showed that CK10 immunostained only superficial keratinized epithelial layers in 11 cases, and also intermediate spinous layers in 18 cases. Cytokeratin 14 was expressed in all epithelial layers of 31 cases, in two cases its expression was in the basal and intermediate layers, and one case was negative. Cytokeratin 13 immunostained 26 cases and was negative in eight cases. In these eight cases, CK13 was apparently replaced by CK16. Cytokeratin 16, besides these eight cases, was also expressed in the spinous intermediate layers of a further eight cases. The remaining CKs tested were all negative. No relation between the degree of dysplasia and the CK expression was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Cytokeratin expression in AC is different from that of normal oral mucosa, and is not related to the degree of dysplasia.
Authors: Bianca C Bianco; Fernanda M Scotti; Daniella S C Vieira; Michelle T Biz; Renata G Castro; Filipe Modolo Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Gabriela Salvadori; Jean Nunes Dos Santos; Marco Antonio Trevizani Martins; Artur Cunha Vasconcelos; Luise Meurer; Pantelis Varvaki Rados; Vinicius Coelho Carrard; Manoela Domingues Martins Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2014-05-06
Authors: Maria da Conceição Andrade de Freitas; Luciana Maria Pedreira Ramalho; Flávia Caló Aquino Xavier; André Luis Gomes Moreira; Sílvia Regina Almeida Reis Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2008 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.698