Literature DB >> 12680637

A comparison of virus isolation, immunohistochemistry, fetal serology, and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for the identification of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus transplacental infection in the fetus.

James E Benson1, Michael J Yaeger, Jane Christopher-Hennings, Kelly Lager, Kyoung-Jin Yoon.   

Abstract

Virus isolation (VI), immunohistochemistry (IHC), fetal serology, and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) were performed on samples from 107 fetuses comprising 10 litters taken from sows experimentally infected with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). In addition to comparing the relative sensitivity and specificity of each test, RT-PCR was evaluated with respect to the relative suitability of thoracic fluids and tissues as samples, the effects of autolysis, and the effects of pooling of fetal specimens. VI, IHC, and fetal serology identified PRRSV infection in 48.6%, 23.4%, and 14.9% of 107 fetuses, respectively, and identified at least 1 infected fetus in 10, 10, and 5 of 10 litters, respectively. In utero death with autolysis reduced the test efficacy of all 3 methods. Fetal thoracic fluid and tissues were equally suitable for RT-PCR detection of PRRSV. Pooling fetal tissues or fluids from VI-positive animals with comparable material from negative controls had no detrimental effect on RT-PCR results when evaluated at dilutions of 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, and 1:8. The results of RT-PCR testing were positive in 100%, 94.4%, and 83.3% of VI-positive specimens allowed to autolyze at 4, 21, or 37 C, respectively, for 24, 48, and 96 hours. Compared with the other testing modalities, RT-PCR appeared to be impacted the least by the adverse effects of autolysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12680637     DOI: 10.1177/104063870201400103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of ZMAC and MARC-145 Cell Lines for Improving Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Isolation from Clinical Samples.

Authors:  Wannarat Yim-Im; Haiyan Huang; Jie Park; Chong Wang; Gabriela Calzada; Phillip Gauger; Karen Harmon; Rodger Main; Jianqiang Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Reproductive failure associated with coinfection of porcine circovirus type 2 and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

Authors:  Chun Kuen Mak; Ching Yang; Chian-Ren Jeng; Victor Fei Pang; Kuang-Sheng Yeh
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 3.  The interaction between PRRSV and the late gestation pig fetus.

Authors:  Raymond R R Rowland
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 3.303

4.  Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related to the probability of transmission of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSv) to naive pigs via fresh meat.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2005-08-12

5.  Detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in oral fluid from naturally infected pigs in a breeding herd.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Trang; Takuya Hirai; Tsukasa Yamamoto; Mari Matsuda; Naoko Okumura; Nguyen Thi Huong Giang; Nguyen Thi Lan; Ryoji Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.672

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.