BACKGROUND: Coronary calcification is a potent independent predictor of coronary risk. Sex-specific risk categories based on calcium scores have been established, but ethnic differences in coronary calcification have been little studied. This prospective cohort study compares coronary calcification, assessed by computed tomography, in postmenopausal black women and white women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Computed tomographic scans were performed on 128 black women and 733 white women without known coronary artery disease (mean age 63 +/- 8 years). Although coronary risk factors were more prevalent among black women (P <.0001), total calcium scores were similar to those in white women. By use of the Framingham algorithm, higher calcium scores were associated with higher 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or coronary death. In multiple regression analysis, age was independently associated with higher calcium scores in both ethnic groups (P =.002 for black women, P <.0001 for white women). Diabetes mellitus and not exercising at least 3 times per week were independently associated with higher calcium scores in white women but not black women. Educational level, body mass index, current hormone replacement therapy, hysterectomy, dietary fat consumption, family history of premature coronary disease, hypertension, self-reported high cholesterol, and current smoking were not independently associated with coronary calcium score in black women, white women, or the combined cohort; neither was ethnicity an independent predictor of coronary calcification. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher dietary fat consumption, higher body mass index, and greater prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking, black women had coronary calcium scores similar to those of white women. Ethnicity was not an independent predictor of coronary calcification.
BACKGROUND:Coronary calcification is a potent independent predictor of coronary risk. Sex-specific risk categories based on calcium scores have been established, but ethnic differences in coronary calcification have been little studied. This prospective cohort study compares coronary calcification, assessed by computed tomography, in postmenopausal black women and white women. METHODS AND RESULTS: Computed tomographic scans were performed on 128 black women and 733 white women without known coronary artery disease (mean age 63 +/- 8 years). Although coronary risk factors were more prevalent among black women (P <.0001), total calcium scores were similar to those in white women. By use of the Framingham algorithm, higher calcium scores were associated with higher 10-year risk of myocardial infarction or coronary death. In multiple regression analysis, age was independently associated with higher calcium scores in both ethnic groups (P =.002 for black women, P <.0001 for white women). Diabetes mellitus and not exercising at least 3 times per week were independently associated with higher calcium scores in white women but not black women. Educational level, body mass index, current hormone replacement therapy, hysterectomy, dietary fat consumption, family history of premature coronary disease, hypertension, self-reported high cholesterol, and current smoking were not independently associated with coronary calcium score in black women, white women, or the combined cohort; neither was ethnicity an independent predictor of coronary calcification. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher dietary fat consumption, higher body mass index, and greater prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking, black women had coronary calcium scores similar to those of white women. Ethnicity was not an independent predictor of coronary calcification.
Authors: Andrea L Rosso; Jennifer Pelt Wisdom; Willi Horner-Johnson; Marjorie G McGee; Yvonne L Michael Journal: Maturitas Date: 2010-11-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Lynne E Wagenknecht; Jasmin Divers; Alain G Bertoni; Carl D Langefeld; J Jeffrey Carr; Donald W Bowden; Steven C Elbein; Steven Shea; Cora E Lewis; Barry I Freedman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Aiman El-Saed; Akira Sekikawa; Daniel Edmundowicz; Rhobert W Evans; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; Takashi Kadowaki; Jina Choo; Tomoko Takamiya; Lewis H Kuller Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: B I Freedman; F C Hsu; C D Langefeld; S S Rich; D M Herrington; J J Carr; J Xu; D W Bowden; L E Wagenknecht Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Alisha N Wade; Sean Fedyna; Nehal N Mehta; Caitlin St Clair; Naeema Ginwala; Rama K Krishna; Atif N Qasim; Seth Braunstein; Nayyar Iqbal; Mark H Schutta; Muredach P Reilly Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Rosemay A Remigio-Baker; Matthew A Allison; Nketi I Forbang; Rohit Loomba; Cheryl A M Anderson; Matthew Budoff; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Roger S Blumenthal; Pamela Ouyang; Michael H Criqui Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Matthew A Allison; Joann E Manson; Robert D Langer; J Jeffrey Carr; Jacques E Rossouw; Mary B Pettinger; Lawrence Phillips; Barbara B Cochrane; Charles B Eaton; Philip Greenland; Susan Hendrix; Judith Hsia; Julie R Hunt; Rebecca D Jackson; Karen C Johnson; Lewis H Kuller; Jennifer Robinson Journal: Menopause Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Elisa Y Rhew; Susan M Manzi; Alan R Dyer; Amy H Kao; Natalya Danchenko; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell; David D McPherson; William Pearce; Daniel Edmundowicz; George T Kondos; Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman Journal: Transl Res Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Ahmed Fathala; Saleh Alreshoodi; Mashael Al Rujaib; Mohamed Shoukri; Hani Al Sergani; Jehad Al Buriki; Abdulaziz Al Sugair Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2015 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.526