Literature DB >> 12679665

Treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy with posterior decompression and fusion with lateral mass plate fixation and local bone graft.

Russel C Huang1, Federico P Girardi, Ashley R Poynton, Frank P Cammisa.   

Abstract

This is a retrospective review of 32 patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy treated by laminectomy and lateral mass plate fusion. The prognosis of surgically treated myelopathy is evaluated as well as prognostic factors for recovery of myelopathy. Diagnoses included cervical spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Final follow-up was at 15.2 months (mean) postoperatively. Myelopathy was graded preoperatively and postoperatively by the system of Nurick. All patients had preoperative radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The presence of abnormal T2-weighted MRI signal (myelomalacia) was noted. Postoperative studies included flexion-extension radiographs to assess fusion and MRI to evaluate decompression of neural elements and resolution of myelomalacia. Severity of preoperative Nurick myelopathy, presence of myelomalacia, and age were evaluated as potential prognostic indicators for surgically treated myelopathy. Mean Nurick score improved from 2.6 (range 1-4) to 1.8 (range 0-3) postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Twenty-two patients (71%) had improvement in Nurick grade of at least one point, and nine showed no improvement. No patients had deterioration of Nurick grade. Preoperative myelomalacia was noted in 15 (47%) patients, and all 15 had residual myelomalacia postoperatively. Severe myelopathy, age, and myelomalacia had no prognostic value for improvement of myelopathy. Complications included pseudarthrosis (3%), wound infection (9%), and transient C5 palsy (6%). This study demonstrates excellent outcomes from laminectomy and fusion in multilevel cervical myelopathy. A high rate of improvement of myelopathy was observed, neurologic deterioration did not occur, and complication rates were low. Severe myelopathy and myelomalacia on preoperative MRI had no prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12679665     DOI: 10.1097/00024720-200304000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  21 in total

1.  Does smoking influence fusion rates in posterior cervical arthrodesis with lateral mass instrumentation?

Authors:  Jason David Eubanks; Steven W Thorpe; Vinay K Cheruvu; Brett A Braly; James D Kang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Successful treatment of cervical myelopathy with minimal morbidity by circumferential decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Henry E Aryan; Rene O Sanchez-Mejia; Sharona Ben-Haim; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zoher Ghogawala; Norma Terrin; Melissa R Dunbar; Janis L Breeze; Karen M Freund; Adam S Kanter; Praveen V Mummaneni; Erica F Bisson; Fred G Barker; J Sanford Schwartz; James S Harrop; Subu N Magge; Robert F Heary; Michael G Fehlings; Todd J Albert; Paul M Arnold; K Daniel Riew; Michael P Steinmetz; Marjorie C Wang; Robert G Whitmore; John G Heller; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Regression of Anterior Disk-Osteophyte Complex Following Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Adedayo O Ashana; Jeremiah R Cohen; Brandon Evans; Langston T Holly
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  Increased in-hospital complications after primary posterior versus primary anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Alexander Hughes; Yan Ma; Ya Lin Chiu; Andrew A Sama; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Adam M Caputo; Charles Z Sheets; Mitchell R Klement; Keith W Michael; Robert E Isaacs; Christopher R Brown
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Prevalence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical decompressive surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fenyong Shou; Zhe Li; Huan Wang; Chongnan Yan; Qi Liu; Chi Xiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy surgical trial: randomized, controlled trial design and rationale.

Authors:  Zoher Ghogawala; Edward C Benzel; Robert F Heary; K Daniel Riew; Todd J Albert; William E Butler; Fred G Barker; John G Heller; Paul C McCormick; Robert G Whitmore; Karen M Freund; J Sanford Schwartz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 10.  C5 nerve root palsy following decompression of cervical spine with anterior versus posterior types of procedures in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Recep Basaran; Tuncay Kaner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.