| Literature DB >> 12679626 |
Hartmut Meister1, Isabel Lausberg, Jürgen Kiessling, Hasso von Wedel, Martin Walger.
Abstract
Various inventories have been developed to quantify the success of hearing aid provision. Though numerous parameters including initial measures (hearing disability, handicap) or 'outcome measures' (e.g. benefit, satisfaction and usage) are recorded, relationships and interactions among them are still unclear. A study applying a questionnaire addressing 11 domains relevant to amplification was conducted in order to generate different psychometric models with the AMOS software package for structural equation modeling. The models expose easily interpretable interactions and are helpful in understanding effects occurring with commonly used outcome measures: benefit reflects the difference between the aided and unaided condition but additionally comprises the importance of the hearing aid within a specific situation. Satisfaction is highly reliant on benefit. Usage is strongly dependent on the severity of hearing problems and therefore not appropriate in assessing the success of amplification. Moreover, the models help to predict the outcome of clinically used inventories (i.e. the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile). Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, BaselEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12679626 DOI: 10.1159/000069479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Audiol Neurootol ISSN: 1420-3030 Impact factor: 1.854