Literature DB >> 12679225

Left ventricular septal and apex pacing for optimal pump function in canine hearts.

Maaike Peschar1, Hans de Swart, Koen J Michels, Robert S Reneman, Frits W Prinzen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) pump function is optimal when pacing is performed at the LV near the sites where the impulses exit the Purkinje system.
BACKGROUND: Pacing at the conventional site, the right ventricular (RV) apex, adversely affects hemodynamics. During normal sinus rhythm (SR), electrical activation of the working myocardium starts at the LV septal endocardium and spreads from apex to base.
METHODS: Experiments were conducted in anesthetized open-chest dogs with normal ventricular conduction to investigate hemodynamic effects of pacing at various epicardial LV sites, the RV apex, and combinations of these sites (n = 11) and of RV and LV septal pacing (n = 8). The LV septal endocardium was reached via the RV by puncturing through the septum with a barbed electrode. Left ventricular systolic (LVdP/dtpos and stroke work) and diastolic (LVdP/dtneg and Tau) function were assessed using pressure-volume relations (conductance catheter technique).
RESULTS: Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function were highly dependent on the site of pacing, but not on QRS duration. Left ventricular function was maintained at SR level during LV septal, LV apex, and multisite pacing, was moderately depressed during pacing at epicardial LV free wall sites, and was most severely depressed during RV apex pacing. On average, RV septal pacing did not improve LV function, compared with RV apex pacing, but in each experiment one (variable) RV pacing site was found, which only moderately reduced LV function.
CONCLUSIONS: During ventricular pacing, LV pump function is maintained best (i.e., at SR level) when pacing at the LV septum or LV apex, potentially because pacing from these sites creates a physiological propagation of electrical conduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12679225     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00091-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  25 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular endocardial pacing and multisite pacing to improve CRT response.

Authors:  Sylvain Ploux; Zachary Whinnett; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Feasibility of his bundle pacing as an alternative pacing site: measurement of his refractoriness.

Authors:  Lorne J Gula; Geoffrey M Trim; Andrew D Krahn; Allan C Skanes; Raymond Yee; George J Klein
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Mechanical synchrony: role of surgical ventricular restoration in correcting LV dyssynchrony during chamber rebuilding.

Authors:  M DiDonato; A Toso; V Dor; M Sabatier; L Menicanti; F Fantini; G Buckberg
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  [His-bundle stimulation and alternative RV stimulation sites].

Authors:  G Fröhlig; M Kindermann
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-03

6.  Chronic left ventricular pacing preserves left ventricular function in children.

Authors:  Irene E van Geldorp; Ward Y Vanagt; Urs Bauersfeld; Maren Tomaske; Frits W Prinzen; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Relationship between left ventricular lead position using a simple radiographic classification scheme and long-term outcome with resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Stephen B Wilton; Mariko A Shibata; Rachel Sondergaard; Karen Cowan; Lisa Semeniuk; Derek V Exner
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  [Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

Review 9.  J wave syndromes.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch; Gan-Xin Yan
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Quantifying the role of regional dyssynchrony on global left ventricular performance.

Authors:  Bouchra Lamia; Masaki Tanabe; Hyung Kook Kim; Lauren Johnson; John Gorcsan; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.