Literature DB >> 12679046

On the role of peripheral visual afferent information for the control of rapid video-aiming movements.

Patrick Bédard1, Luc Proteau.   

Abstract

It has been shown that, even for very fast and short duration movements, seeing one's hand in peripheral vision, or a cursor representing it on a video screen, resulted in a better direction accuracy of a manual aiming movement than when the task was performed while only the target was visible. However, it is still unclear whether this was caused by on-line or off-line processes. Through a novel series of analyses, the goal of the present study was to shed some light on this issue. We replicated previous results showing that the visual information concerning one's movement, which is available between 40 degrees and 25 degrees of visual angle, is not useful to ensure direction accuracy of video-aiming movements, whereas visual afferent information available between 40 degrees and 15 degrees of visual angle improved direction accuracy over a target-only condition. In addition, endpoint variability on the direction component of the task was scaled to direction variability observed at peak movement velocity. Similar observations were made in a second experiment when the position of the cursor was translated to the left or to the right as soon as it left the starting base. Further, the data showed no evidence of on-line correction to the direction dimension of the task for the translated trials. Taken together, the results of the two experiments strongly suggest that, for fast video-aiming movements, the information concerning one's movement that is available in peripheral vision is used off-line. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12679046     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(03)00020-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  6 in total

1.  The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Gavin P Lawrence; Ian M Franks; Eric Buckolz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-03-25

4.  The effect of state anxiety on the online and offline control of fast target-directed movements.

Authors:  Gavin P Lawrence; Michael A Khan; Lew Hardy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-05-24

5.  Automatic movement error detection and correction processes in reaching movements.

Authors:  Julien Brière; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  An anti-inertial motion bias explains people discounting inertial motion of carried objects.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Kirsten M Greer; Jackson T Schaffer; Clayton C Richardson; John Thrasher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.