Literature DB >> 12678940

Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions as a Screening Tool for Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Lynne Marshall1, Judy A. Lapsley Miller, Laurie M. Heller.   

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss includes both temporary (TTS) and permanent (PTS) threshold shifts. Although TTS and PTS have many similarities, their underlying mechanisms are different. Both TTS and PTS are seen in hearing-conservation programs, making it important to consider both when making physiological measurements of inner-ear damage in applied settings. There are many ways that physiological mechanisms could be useful in screening for NIHL. Can normal-hearing and NIHL ears be differentiated from one another? Can the physiological measure be used in place of behavioural hearing-threshold measures of TTS and PTS? Can it be used to indicate sub-clinical damage (i.e., noise-induced permanent alterations to the inner ear without a corresponding hearing decrement)? Can it be used to indicate pre-clinical hearing loss (i.e., the sub-clinical damage eventually turns into hearing loss)? Finally, can the physiological measure be used to predict susceptibility to NIHL? Evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) depend on normal outer hair cells for their generation. Because this is the site in the inner ear in humans that is most susceptible to noise, there has been considerable interest in the application of EOAEs to NIHL screening. In this review, the application of distortion-product EOAEs (DPOAEs) is considered for this purpose, emphasizing work from our laboratory, but including that of others as well. Wherever possible, we compare the performance of DPOAEs as a screening tool to transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). We emphasize the importance of how well DPOAEs perform in screening for NIHL in individuals rather than for groups of people; the importance of using large numbers of subjects; and the importance of longitudinal studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 12678940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Noise Health        ISSN: 1463-1741            Impact factor:   0.867


  14 in total

1.  Occupational noise exposure and sensorineural hearing loss among workers of a steel rolling mill.

Authors:  Foluwasayo E Ologe; Tanimola M Akande; Toye G Olajide
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Shawna Dell; Brittany Hensley; James W Hall; Kathleen C M Campbell; Patrick J Antonelli; Glenn E Green; James M Miller; Kenneth Guire
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Multivariate DPOAE metrics for identifying changes in hearing: perspectives from ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission data in perinatally HIV-infected and HIV-exposed but uninfected children and adolescents in the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peter Torre; Tzy-Jyun Yao; Bret Zeldow; Paige Williams; Howard J Hoffman; George K Siberry
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Effects of the depth of anesthesia on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Thorsten Ropposch; Christian Walch; Alexander Avian; Gerlinde Mausser; Manuela Spary
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Temporary reduction of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) immediately following auditory brainstem response (ABR).

Authors:  Anand N Mhatre; Bobby Tajudeen; Elena M Welt; Christopher Wartmann; Glenis R Long; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The influence of self-reported noise exposure on 2ƒ12 distortion product otoacoustic emission level, fine structure, and components in a normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) as an Appropriate Tool in Assessment of Otoprotective Effects of Antioxidants in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL).

Authors:  Afsaneh Doosti; Yones Lotfi; Abdollah Moosavi; Enayatollah Bakhshi; Azita Hajhossein Talasaz
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04-17

10.  Cochlear function among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative men and women.

Authors:  Peter Torre; Howard J Hoffman; Gayle Springer; Christopher Cox; Mary Young; Joseph B Margolick; Michael Plankey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.