Literature DB >> 12678629

Change detection is impaired in children with dyslexia.

Jacqueline S Rutkowski1, David P Crewther, Sheila G Crewther.   

Abstract

The severe deficits in rapid automatized naming demonstrated by children with developmental dyslexia has usually been interpreted in terms of a deficit in speed of access to the lexicon rather than as a possible deficit in speed of visual object recognition. Yet fluent reading requires rapid visual recognition and semantic interpretation of new letters and words appearing in successive fixations of the eyes. Thus we wondered whether change detection performance was related to reading ability. We investigated whether children with developmental dyslexia (DD) were less able to detect change in a simple display--gap--display paradigm than normal reading (NR) children of the same age and children with impaired reading and mentation (LD). In a first experimental phase, the DDs required a longer initial exposure of four letter items in order to detect change of a single letter at a level of 71% correct, compared with NRs performing at the same level. Thus the deficit in reading in DD is associated with a deficit in early processes associated with visual recognition. In a second experimental phase (using the individual target display exposures measured in the first phase), cues appeared during the 250 ms gap for a period of either 0 (no cue), 50 or 200 ms immediately prior to the presentation of the second (comparison) display. Children of all groups showed dependence on the presence of the cue to help make a judgement of change (versus no change), with the NRs least affected. When change was detected in the presence of a cue, the NRs were better able to identify the new letter than either of the other groups. However, only about 50% of the correct detections were accompanied by a correct identification. Despite published reports of a mini-neglect for left visual field in dyslexic adults, none of our groups showed such an effect. However, a significant upper visual field (UpVF) advantage in change detection performance was found across groups, which we interpret in terms of the interactions of the ventral and dorsal streams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12678629     DOI: 10.1167/3.1.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  10 in total

1.  Mathematical impairment associated with high-contrast abnormalities in change detection and magnocellular visual evoked response.

Authors:  Nicola R Jastrzebski; Sheila G Crewther; David P Crewther
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  TMS disruption of V5/MT+ indicates a role for the dorsal stream in word recognition.

Authors:  Robin Laycock; David P Crewther; Paul B Fitzgerald; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Parietal function in good and poor readers.

Authors:  Robin Laycock; Sheila G Crewther; Patricia M Kiely; David P Crewther
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 4.  Neural Markers Associated with the Temporal Deployment of Attention: A Systematic Review of Non-motor Psychophysical Measures Post-stroke.

Authors:  Essie Low; Robin Laycock; Sheila Crewther
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Time for a Systems Biological Approach to Cognitive Aging?-A Critical Review.

Authors:  Deena Ebaid; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup.

Authors:  Jessica L Peters; Edith L Bavin; Alyse Brown; David P Crewther; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Developmental dyslexia and vision.

Authors:  Patrick Quercia; Léonard Feiss; Carine Michel
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-05-14

8.  Temporal sampling in vision and the implications for dyslexia.

Authors:  Kristen Pammer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Preliminary validation of FastaReada as a measure of reading fluency.

Authors:  Zena Elhassan; Sheila G Crewther; Edith L Bavin; David P Crewther
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-27

10.  Advantage of detecting visual events in the right hemifield is affected by reading skill.

Authors:  Samy Rima; Grace Kerbyson; Elizabeth Jones; Michael C Schmid
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.