Literature DB >> 12678598

Optimal methods for calculating classification images: weighted sums.

Richard F Murray1, Patrick J Bennett, Allison B Sekuler.   

Abstract

In signal detection theory, an observer's responses are often modeled as being based on a decision variable obtained by cross-correlating the stimulus with a template, possibly after corruption by external and internal noise. The response classification method estimates an observer's template by measuring the influence of each pixel of external noise on the observer's responses. A map that shows the influence of each pixel is called a classification image. Other authors have shown how to calculate classification images from external noise fields, but the optimal calculation has never been determined, and the quality of the resulting classification images has never been evaluated. Here we derive the optimal weighted sum of noise fields for calculating classification images in several experimental designs, and we derive the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the resulting classification images. Using the expressions for the SNR, we show how to choose experimental parameters, such as the observer's performance level and the external noise power, to obtain classification images with a high SNR. We discuss two-alternative identification experiments in which the stimulus is presented at one or more contrast levels, in which each stimulus is presented twice so that we can estimate the power of the internal noise from the consistency of the observer's responses, and in which the observer rates the confidence of his responses. We illustrate these methods in a series of contrast increment detection experiments.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12678598     DOI: 10.1167/2.1.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  26 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Classification images with uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Anirvan S Nandy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Surround motion silences signals from same-direction motion.

Authors:  Peter Neri; Dennis Levi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Classification images reveal decision variables and strategies in forced choice tasks.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Richard F Murray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Pattern recognition in correlated and uncorrelated noise.

Authors:  Brianna Conrey; Jason M Gold
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Image correlates of crowding in natural scenes.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Task-specific codes for face recognition: how they shape the neural representation of features for detection and individuation.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Jean M Vettel; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.