Literature DB >> 12678569

Cost-benefit model comparing two alternative immunisation programmes against serogroup C meningococcal disease: for Quebec residents aged 2 months to 20 years.

Carol Rancourt1, Jean-Pierre Grégoire, W Simons, Alain Dostie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most efficient approach to managing an outbreak of serogroup C meningococcal disease. An early planned mass immunisation programme (MIP) was compared with a delayed programme implemented at the peak of a meningococcal outbreak. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A cost-benefit model was constructed of meningococcal cases reported in Quebec, Canada, from 1990-1993, before and after the MIP, during the winter of 1992-1993, when 84% of residents aged 6 months to 20 years were vaccinated. Epidemiological data from 1990-1993 were transposed to 2002-2003 under the assumption that Quebec is on the brink of an identical outbreak cycle. All Quebec residents aged 2 months to 20 years were assumed to be vaccinated, which required a total of 1.7 million doses of conjugated vaccine. Clinical and economic outcomes of both vaccination scenarios were compared. All costs were transformed to 2001 Canadian dollars ($Can), at an annual inflation rate of 3%. Future earnings due to premature death were discounted at 5% per year with a 3% increase in wages per year and a 9% unemployment rate. PERSPECTIVE: Ministry of Health and society. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of new cases avoided and the prevention of hospital and societal costs due to meningococcal disease-attributed premature mortality and morbidity, and direct costs associated with implementation of a MIP.
RESULTS: When compared with a delayed MIP over a 14-month period, an early planned MIP would have prevented 112 new cases of meningococcal disease (16 deaths, 21 major complications) while saving $ Can 37.1 million in total direct costs to the Ministry of Health and an additional $ Can 17.4 million in societal costs in the province of Quebec.
CONCLUSION: An early planned MIP implemented in Quebec in September 2001, should be cost beneficial compared with delaying mass immunisation until a meningococcal outbreak is underway. Although this conclusion is limited by the assumption that epidemiological trends in 2001 in absence of a MIP would have been similar to that observed in the early 1990s prior to the MIP, the analysis still indicates that an early MIP in the 1990s would have been cost beneficial compared with a delayed MIP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12678569     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200321060-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  15 in total

1.  Preventive immunisation could reduce the risk of meningococcal epidemics in the African meningitis belt.

Authors:  J P Chippaux; G Campagne; S Djibo; L Cissé; A Hassane; I Kanta
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Comparison of cost-effectiveness of preventive and reactive mass immunization campaigns against meningococcal meningitis in West Africa: a theoretical modeling analysis.

Authors:  I Parent du Châtelet; B D Gessner; A da Silva
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Meningococcal disease.

Authors:  N E Rosenstein; B A Perkins; D S Stephens; T Popovic; J M Hughes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The societal costs of severe to profound hearing loss in the United States.

Authors:  P E Mohr; J J Feldman; J L Dunbar; A McConkey-Robbins; J K Niparko; R K Rittenhouse; M W Skinner
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 5.  Meningococcal vaccines.

Authors:  N E Rosenstein; M Fischer; J W Tappero
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.982

6.  Rehabilitation of below-knee amputees: factors influencing outcome and costs in three programmes.

Authors:  J P Durance; W K Warren; D B Kerbel; T W Stroud
Journal:  Int Disabil Stud       Date:  1989 Jul-Sep

7.  Complications and sequelae of meningococcal disease in Quebec, Canada, 1990-1994.

Authors:  L Erickson; P De Wals
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  A R Tunkel; W M Scheld
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Cost analysis of dialysis treatments for end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Authors:  R Goeree; J Manalich; P Grootendorst; M L Beecroft; D N Churchill
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 0.825

Review 10.  Guidelines for control of meningococcal disease. Laboratory Centre for Disease Control. Canadian Consensus Conference on Meningococcal Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of economic evaluation in vaccine decision making: focus on meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine.

Authors:  Robert Welte; Caroline L Trotter; W John Edmunds; Maarten J Postma; Philippe Beutels
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Methodological concerns with economic evaluations of meningococcal vaccines.

Authors:  Teresa L Kauf
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Economic evaluations of vaccines in Canada: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ellen R S Rafferty; Heather L Gagnon; Marwa Farag; Cheryl L Waldner
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2017-05-05

4.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for vaccination of adolescents against serogroup B IMD with the MenB-FHbp vaccine in Canada.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Breton; Liping Huang; Sonya J Snedecor; Noelle Cornelio; Fiorella Fanton-Aita
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-01-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.