Literature DB >> 12677739

Acute rhinosinusitis in primary care: a comparison of symptoms, signs, ultrasound, and radiography.

Helena Varonen1, Seppo Savolainen, Ilkka Kunnamo, Riikka Heikkinen, Matti Revonta.   

Abstract

In primary care, the diagnosis of acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) is based most often only on symptoms and clinical examination. This practice leads to many false positive diagnoses and unnecessary use of antibiotics. Sinus ultrasound has been suggested as a means to improve the accuracy of AMS diagnosis. We studied the symptoms, signs, and ultrasound findings in patients with acute rhinosinusitis. Primary care physicians received small group teaching on sinus ultrasound technique. Sinus radiography was performed in a subgroup of patients, and it acted as reference standard. A total of 150 adult patients were recruited to the study, 105 women (70%) and 45 men (30%). Thirteen patients of 32 (41%) in the radiography subgroup and 74 patients of 148 (50%) with ultrasound result had AMS. The sensitivity of ultrasound compared to radiography was 92% and specificity was 95% when results were calculated per patients as unit of analysis. With practice and teaching primary care physicians can perform sinus ultrasound as accurately as specialists. Symptoms and clinical examination were not reliable in AMS diagnosis. If the criterion for AMS diagnosis were fluid in maxillary sinuses in ultrasound instead of clinical impression, the number of antibiotic prescriptions would be reduced by half in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12677739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding; Peter Hellings; Isam Alobid; Claus Bachert; Wytske Fokkens; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Philippe Gevaert; Josep Guilemany; Livije Kalogjera; Valerie Lund; Joaquim Mullol; Giovanni Passalacqua; Elina Toskala; Cornelius van Drunen
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 2.  Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis in primary care: a systematic review of test accuracy.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell; Brian McKay; Ryan Guilbault; Yokabed Ermias
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Accuracy of Signs and Symptoms for the Diagnosis of Acute Rhinosinusitis and Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Mark H Ebell; Brian McKay; Ariella Dale; Ryan Guilbault; Yokabed Ermias
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Rhinosinusitis in morbidity registrations in Dutch General Practice: a retro-spective case-control study.

Authors:  Ruth Hoffmans; Tjard Schermer; Karin van der Linde; Hans Bor; Kees van Boven; Chris van Weel; Wytske Fokkens
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.497

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.