Literature DB >> 12676520

The effect of amygdala lesions on conditional and unconditional vocalizations in rats.

George S Borszcz1, Robert N Leaton.   

Abstract

Electrolytic lesions centered on the amygdaloid central nucleus (ACe) resulted in the inability of rats to acquire a Pavlovian conditional vocalization response. Conditioning consisted of pairing a light conditional stimulus with a tailshock unconditional stimulus (US). The thresholds of three unconditional responses (URs) to tailshock were assessed prior to conditioning. These URs are organized at spinal (spinal motor reflexes), medullary (vocalizations during shock), and forebrain (vocalization afterdischarges, VADs) levels of the neuraxis. Compared to sham-lesioned controls, rats with amygdala lesions exhibited a selective elevation in the threshold of VADs. During conditioning the amplitude and duration of VADs were selectively reduced in amygdala-lesioned rats. These findings support earlier observations of that elicitation of VADs by tailshock correlates with the capacity of this US to support fear conditioning. The ACe may be involved in both associative and non-associative aspects of fear conditioning, but for progress in our understanding it is essential to evaluate its role in the generation of conditioning relevant URs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12676520     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-7427(03)00002-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  17 in total

1.  Functional interaction between medial thalamus and rostral anterior cingulate cortex in the suppression of pain affect.

Authors:  S E Harte; C A Spuz; G S Borszcz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Multiple forebrain systems converge on motor neurons innervating the thyroarytenoid muscle.

Authors:  D J Van Daele; Martin D Cassell
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Group III mGluR7 and mGluR8 in the amygdala differentially modulate nocifensive and affective pain behaviors.

Authors:  Enza Palazzo; Yu Fu; Guangchen Ji; Sabatino Maione; Volker Neugebauer
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  NMDA or non-NMDA receptor antagonism within the amygdaloid central nucleus suppresses the affective dimension of pain in rats: evidence for hemispheric synergy.

Authors:  Catherine A Spuz; George S Borszcz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor agonism and antagonism within the amygdaloid central nucleus suppresses pain affect: differential contribution of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray.

Authors:  Catherine A Spuz; Michelle L Tomaszycki; George S Borszcz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Contribution of the ventromedial hypothalamus to generation of the affective dimension of pain.

Authors:  George S Borszcz
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Contribution of the periaqueductal gray to the suppression of pain affect produced by administration of morphine into the intralaminar thalamus of rat.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Munn; Steven E Harte; Alexander Lagman; George S Borszcz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  Separating analgesia from reward within the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  E Schifirneţ; S E Bowen; G S Borszcz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Intra-amygdala muscimol injections impair freezing and place avoidance in aversive contextual conditioning.

Authors:  Matthew R Holahan; Norman M White
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Affective analgesia following muscarinic activation of the ventral tegmental area in rats.

Authors:  Robert G Kender; Steven E Harte; Elizabeth M Munn; George S Borszcz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.820

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.