Literature DB >> 12676389

Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening.

S Niromanesh1, A Mosavi-Jarrahi, F Samkhaniani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the intracervical Foley balloon catheter and 3 mg prostaglandin E(2) tablet(s) in preinduction cervical ripening.
METHODS: Ninety women referred to the maternity clinic for induction of labor with a Bishop score of less than or equal to 5 were randomized to receive an intracervical Foley catheter or prostaglandin E(2) tablets. The primary measured outcome was ripening of the cervix as measured with the Bishop score.
RESULTS: There were no differences in mean Bishop scores between the prostaglandin and the Foley catheter groups. Bishop scores (mean+/-S.D.) after ripening were 6.6+/-0.80 and 6.7+/-0.86 for the Foley catheter and prostaglandin groups, respectively (P=0.54). The Foley catheter group showed a statistically shorter time to ripening compared with the prostaglandin group (3.4+/-2.1 and 6.5+/-3.2 h, respectively (P=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in induction time (4.8+/-1.8 h and 5.3+/-2.4 h, respectively (P=0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in preinduction cervical ripening efficacy between prostaglandin E(2) and the Foley catheter, but the Foley catheter has the advantage of ripening an unfavorable cervix in a shorter time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12676389     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00392-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Rachel A Haws; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lixia Zhu; Cong Zhang; Fang Cao; Qin Liu; Xing Gu; Jianhao Xu; Jianqing Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

4.  A randomized controlled trial of foley catheter, extra-amniotic saline infusion and prostaglandin e2 suppository for labor induction.

Authors:  Mandana Mansour Ghanaie; Mina Jafarabadi; Forozan Milani; Seyed Alaedin Asgary; Morteza Fallah Karkan
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2013-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.