Literature DB >> 12676062

Lateralization of prefrontal activity during episodic memory retrieval: evidence for the production-monitoring hypothesis.

Roberto Cabeza1, Jill K Locantore, Nicole D Anderson.   

Abstract

We propose a new hypothesis concerning the lateralization of prefrontal cortex (PFC) activity during verbal episodic memory retrieval. The hypothesis states that the left PFC is differentially more involved in semantically guided information production than is the right PFC, and that the right PFC is differentially more involved in monitoring and verification than is the left PFC. This "production-monitoring hypothesis" differs from the existing "systematic-heuristic hypothesis," which proposes that the left PFC is primarily involved in systematic retrieval operations, and the right PFC in heuristic retrieval operations. To compare the two hypotheses, we measured PFC activity using positron emission tomography (PET) during the performance of four episodic retrieval tasks: stem cued recall, associative cued recall, context recognition (source memory), and item recognition. Recall tasks emphasized production processes, whereas recognition tasks emphasized monitoring processes. Stem cued recall and context-recognition tasks underscored systematic operations, whereas associative cued recall and item-recognition tasks underscored heuristic operations. Consistent with the production-monitoring hypothesis, the left PFC was more activated for recall than for recognition tasks and the right PFC was more activated for recognition than for recall tasks. Inconsistent with the systematic-heuristic hypothesis, the left PFC was more activated for heuristic than for systematic tasks and the right PFC showed the converse result. Additionally, the study yielded activation differences outside the PFC. In agreement with a previous recall/recognition PET study, anterior cingulate, cerebellar, and striatal regions were more activated for recall than for recognition tasks, and the converse occurred for posterior parietal regions. A right medial temporal lobe region was more activated for stem cued recall and context recognition than for associative cued recall and item recognition, possibly reflecting perceptual integration. In sum, the results provide evidence for the production-monitoring hypothesis and clarify the role of different brain regions typically activated in PET and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of episodic retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12676062     DOI: 10.1162/089892903321208187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  41 in total

1.  Where is ELSA? The early to late shift in aging.

Authors:  Ilana T Z Dew; Norbou Buchler; Ian G Dobbins; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Contextual interference in recognition memory with age.

Authors:  Angela H Gutchess; Andrew Hebrank; Bradley P Sutton; Eric Leshikar; Michael W L Chee; Jiat Chow Tan; Joshua O S Goh; Denise C Park
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Metamemory experiments in neurological populations: a review.

Authors:  Jasmeet K Pannu; Alfred W Kaszniak
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  The neural correlates of conceptual and perceptual false recognition.

Authors:  Rachel J Garoff-Eaton; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Neural correlates of strategic memory retrieval: differentiating between spatial-associative and temporal-associative strategies.

Authors:  Mischa de Rover; Karl Magnus Petersson; Sieberen P van der Werf; Alexander R Cools; Hans J Berger; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  ERP correlates of item recognition memory: effects of age and performance.

Authors:  David A Wolk; N Mandu Sen; Hyemi Chong; Jenna L Riis; Scott M McGinnis; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Effects of aging on the neural correlates of successful item and source memory encoding.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Scott M Hayes; Steven E Prince; David J Madden; Scott A Huettel; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Reduced specificity of hippocampal and posterior ventrolateral prefrontal activity during relational retrieval in normal aging.

Authors:  Kelly S Giovanello; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  Source monitoring 15 years later: what have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?

Authors:  Karen J Mitchell; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Evaluating the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in memory-guided response with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Massihullah Hamidi; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.