Literature DB >> 12675945

Foot-and-mouth disease in the UK: what should we do next time?

M E J Woolhouse1.   

Abstract

Mathematical models were used to guide the UK foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) control policy during the 2001 epidemic. Based on data collected during the epidemic, prospective modelling using a variety of approaches gave the same conclusions: (i) that the epidemic had not been brought under control by 'traditional' methods, and (ii) that neighbourhood control measures (the contiguous cull) could bring the epidemic under control and result in a net saving of livestock. Retrospective analyses suggest that the subsequent course of the epidemic was consistent with a beneficial impact of the contiguous cull and that it would have been difficult to achieve a better outcome using reactive vaccination, which would have required very large-scale vaccination programmes to have been implemented quickly. Perhaps the most important lesson to be learned is the vital importance of rapid and decisive intervention in response to an outbreak, including the earliest possible implementation of a national ban on the movement of livestock once the presence of disease is confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675945     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.15.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  11 in total

Review 1.  Models of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Matt J Keeling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Constructing the effect of alternative intervention strategies on historic epidemics.

Authors:  A R Cook; G J Gibson; T R Gottwald; C A Gilligan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Small distances can keep bacteria at bay for days.

Authors:  Bram A D van Bunnik; Amos Ssematimba; Thomas J Hagenaars; Gonnie Nodelijk; Manon R Haverkate; Marc J M Bonten; Mary K Hayden; Robert A Weinstein; Martin C J Bootsma; Mart C M De Jong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Decision-making for foot-and-mouth disease control: Objectives matter.

Authors:  William J M Probert; Katriona Shea; Christopher J Fonnesbeck; Michael C Runge; Tim E Carpenter; Salome Dürr; M Graeme Garner; Neil Harvey; Mark A Stevenson; Colleen T Webb; Marleen Werkman; Michael J Tildesley; Matthew J Ferrari
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Connecting network properties of rapidly disseminating epizoonotics.

Authors:  Ariel L Rivas; Folorunso O Fasina; Almira L Hoogesteyn; Steven N Konah; José L Febles; Douglas J Perkins; James M Hyman; Jeanne M Fair; James B Hittner; Steven D Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mathematical modelling of the transmission dynamics of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia reveals minimal target profiles for improved vaccines and diagnostic assays.

Authors:  Amos Ssematimba; Joerg Jores; Jeffrey C Mariner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Simulation of control scenarios of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in Nghe An Province in Vietnam.

Authors:  Hu Suk Lee; Krishna K Thakur; Vuong Nghia Bui; Anh Ngoc Bui; Minh Van Dang; Barbara Wieland
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 5.005

8.  "Wrong, but useful": negotiating uncertainty in infectious disease modelling.

Authors:  Robert M Christley; Maggie Mort; Brian Wynne; Jonathan M Wastling; A Louise Heathwaite; Roger Pickup; Zoë Austin; Sophia M Latham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Biothreat Reduction and Economic Development: The Case of Animal Husbandry in Central Asia.

Authors:  Robert Walker; Jason Blackburn
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2015-12-23

Review 10.  Pre-spillover prevention of emerging zoonotic diseases: what are the targets and what are the tools?

Authors:  J E Childs
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.