BACKGROUND: Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a strong independent predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Nevertheless, because age, blood pressure, heart rate, and gender are strong determinants of both arterial stiffness and mortality, the individual relevance of PWV measurements remains controversial. METHODS: A cohort of 242 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis was studied for a mean (+/- SD) duration of 78 +/- 46 months. At entry, together with standard clinical and biochemical analyses, PWV was measured using Doppler ultrasonography. On the basis of a nomogram established on 469 nonuremic subjects, a theoretical value of PWV was determined in ESRD patients according to their age, blood pressure, gender, and heart period. The PWV index (measured PWV - theoretical PWV) was then calculated for each individual ESRD patient. RESULTS: Based on Cox analysis, the PWV index, but neither pulse pressure nor cardiac mass, was a strong and independent predictor of both cardiovascular and overall mortality, together with age and time on dialysis before inclusion. Patients with positive (versus negative) PWV index had a twofold adjusted risk of mortality during the follow-up. Per each 1 meter/second PWV index increment, we observed a 34% (crude) and a 14% (adjusted) increase in both cardiovascular and overall mortality (P < 0.02 for all). CONCLUSION: In ESRD patients, the calculation of a PWV index provides information about cardiovascular and overall mortality risk with high predictive power, showing that PWV measurements provide discriminatory prognostic power over and above conventional cardiovascular risk factors.
BACKGROUND: Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a strong independent predictor of overall and cardiovascular mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Nevertheless, because age, blood pressure, heart rate, and gender are strong determinants of both arterial stiffness and mortality, the individual relevance of PWV measurements remains controversial. METHODS: A cohort of 242 patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis was studied for a mean (+/- SD) duration of 78 +/- 46 months. At entry, together with standard clinical and biochemical analyses, PWV was measured using Doppler ultrasonography. On the basis of a nomogram established on 469 nonuremic subjects, a theoretical value of PWV was determined in ESRDpatients according to their age, blood pressure, gender, and heart period. The PWV index (measured PWV - theoretical PWV) was then calculated for each individual ESRDpatient. RESULTS: Based on Cox analysis, the PWV index, but neither pulse pressure nor cardiac mass, was a strong and independent predictor of both cardiovascular and overall mortality, together with age and time on dialysis before inclusion. Patients with positive (versus negative) PWV index had a twofold adjusted risk of mortality during the follow-up. Per each 1 meter/second PWV index increment, we observed a 34% (crude) and a 14% (adjusted) increase in both cardiovascular and overall mortality (P < 0.02 for all). CONCLUSION: In ESRDpatients, the calculation of a PWV index provides information about cardiovascular and overall mortality risk with high predictive power, showing that PWV measurements provide discriminatory prognostic power over and above conventional cardiovascular risk factors.
Authors: Min Ji Shin; Sang Heon Song; Ihm Soo Kwak; Soo Bong Lee; Dong Won Lee; Eun Young Seong; Il Young Kim; Harin Rhee; Naria Lee Journal: Clin Exp Nephrol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 2.801
Authors: Andréa E M Stinghen; Ziad A Massy; Helen Vlassara; Gary E Striker; Agnès Boullier Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Tuomo Nieminen; Hannu Uusitalo; Väinö Turjanmaa; Gunilla Bjärnhall; Hans Hedenström; Jukka Mäenpää; Auli Ropo; Pekka Heikkilä; Mika Kähönen Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-05-24 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: J K Inrig; E Z Oddone; V Hasselblad; Barbara Gillespie; U D Patel; D Reddan; R Toto; J Himmelfarb; J F Winchester; J Stivelman; R M Lindsay; L A Szczech Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Michael E Seifert; Lisa de Las Fuentes; Charles Ginsberg; Marcos Rothstein; Dennis J Dietzen; Steven C Cheng; Will Ross; David Windus; Victor G Dávila-Román; Keith A Hruska Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 3.754