Literature DB >> 12675815

The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): a microsatellite analysis.

C Vernesi1, B Crestanello, E Pecchioli, D Tartari, D Caramelli, H Hauffe, G Bertorelle.   

Abstract

The reintroduction of wild boar from central Europe after World War II has contributed substantially to the range expansion of this species in Italy, where indiscriminate hunting in earlier times resulted in extreme demographic reduction. However, the genetic impact of such processes is not well-understood. In this study, 105 individuals from Italian and Hungarian wild boar populations were characterized for nine autosomal microsatellite loci. The Hungarian samples, and two central Italian samples from protected areas (parks) where reintroduction is not documented, were assumed to be representative of the genetic composition of the source and the target populations in the reintroduction process, respectively. Animals hunted in the wild in the Florence area of Tuscany (Italy) were then studied to identify the effects of reintroduction. The results we obtained can be summarized as follows: (i) none of the populations analysed shows genetic evidence of demographic decline; (ii) the three parental populations from Italy and Hungary are genetically distinct; however, the low level of divergence appears in conflict with the naming of the Italian and the European subspecies (Sus scrofa majori and Sus scrofa scrofa, respectively); in addition, the Italian groups appear to be as divergent from each other as they are from the Hungarian population; (iii) most of the individuals hunted near Florence are genetically intermediate between the parental groups, suggesting that hybridization has occurred in this area, the average introgression of Hungarian genotypes is 13%, but approximately 45% of the genetic pool of these individuals can not be directly attributed to any of the parental populations we analysed; (iv) analysis of microsatellite loci, though in a limited number, is an important tool for estimating the genetic effect of reintroduction in the wild boar, and therefore for the development of conservation and management strategies for this species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675815     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01763.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  17 in total

1.  Demographic history, current expansion and future management challenges of wild boar populations in the Balkans and Europe.

Authors:  N Veličković; E Ferreira; M Djan; M Ernst; D Obreht Vidaković; A Monaco; C Fonseca
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  A parameter to quantify the degree of genetic mixing among individuals in hybrid populations.

Authors:  S T Kalinowski; J H Powell
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  An assessment of the genetic diversity and structure within and among populations of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) from Australia and Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  P B S Spencer; J Hampton; S J Lapidge; J Mitchell; J Lee; J R Pluske
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Domestication does not narrow MHC diversity in Sus scrofa.

Authors:  Katerina A Moutou; Evagelia A Koutsogiannouli; Costas Stamatis; Charalambos Billinis; Claudia Kalbe; Massimo Scandura; Zissis Mamuris
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.846

5.  Effects of human perturbation on the genetic make-up of an island population: the case of the Sardinian wild boar.

Authors:  M Scandura; L Iacolina; A Cossu; M Apollonio
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Duplication polymorphism at MHC class II DRB1 locus in the wild boar (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Federica Barbisan; Claudia Savio; Giorgio Bertorelle; Tomaso Patarnello; Leonardo Congiu
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.846

7.  The use of genetics for the management of a recovering population: temporal assessment of migratory peregrine falcons in North America.

Authors:  Jeff A Johnson; Sandra L Talbot; George K Sage; Kurt K Burnham; Joseph W Brown; Tom L Maechtle; William S Seegar; Michael A Yates; Bud Anderson; David P Mindell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genetic characterization and phylogeography of the wild boar Sus scrofa introduced into Uruguay.

Authors:  Graciela García; Julia Vergara; Raúl Lombardi
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.771

9.  Are farm-reared quails for game restocking really common quails (Coturnix coturnix)?: a genetic approach.

Authors:  Ines Sanchez-Donoso; Carles Vilà; Manel Puigcerver; Dalius Butkauskas; José Ramón Caballero de la Calle; Pablo Antonio Morales-Rodríguez; José Domingo Rodríguez-Teijeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reintroductions and genetic introgression from domestic pigs have shaped the genetic population structure of Northwest European wild boar.

Authors:  Daniel J Goedbloed; Pim van Hooft; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Katharina Langenbeck; Walburga Lutz; Richard P M A Crooijmans; Sip E van Wieren; Ron C Ydenberg; Herbert H T Prins
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.