Literature DB >> 12675394

Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance.

Steven E Scullen1, Michael K Mount, Timothy A Judge.   

Abstract

The construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance was assessed by using 2 data sets, each based on a different 360 degrees rating instrument. Specifically, the authors investigated the nature of the constructs measured by developmental ratings, the structural relationships among those constructs, and the generalizability of results across 4 rater perspectives (boss, peer, subordinate, and self). A structure with 4 lower order factors (Technical Skills, Administrative Skills, Human Skills, and Citizenship Behaviors) and 2 higher order factors (Task Performance and Contextual Performance) was tested against competing models. Results consistently supported the lower order constructs, but the higher order structure was problematic, indicating that the structure of ratings is not yet well understood. Multisample analyses indicated few practically significant differences in factor structures across perspectives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12675394     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  3 in total

1.  Employee performance in the knowledge economy: Capturing the keys to success.

Authors:  Rebecca Fauth; Stephen Bevan; Peter Mills
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2008-11-23

2.  Leniency Bias in Performance Ratings: The Big-Five Correlates.

Authors:  Kevin H C Cheng; C Harry Hui; Wayne F Cascio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-10

3.  The Good Manager: Development and Validation of the Managerial Interpersonal Skills Scale.

Authors:  Gerard Beenen; Shaun Pichler; Beth Livingston; Ron Riggio
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.