Literature DB >> 12674408

Employers' efforts to measure and improve hospital quality: determinants of success.

Ateev Mehrotra1, Thomas Bodenheimer, R Adams Dudley.   

Abstract

We examined eleven communities in which an employer coalition created a report card to compare the performance of the community's hospitals. After interviewing employer coalition and hospital representatives from each community, we found great variability in report cards' capacity to prompt quality improvement. Although some were successful, others had less impact because of conflicts between employer coalitions and hospitals. Areas of disagreement included selection of appropriate goals, methodology of quality measurement, whether report cards should be publicly released, and the use of economic incentives to improve quality. We describe these conflicts and offer recommendations for future hospital report cards.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12674408     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  6 in total

1.  Using public reports of patient satisfaction for hospital quality improvement.

Authors:  Judith K Barr; Tierney E Giannotti; Shoshanna Sofaer; Cathy E Duquette; William J Waters; Marcia K Petrillo
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Value-driven health care: the purchasers' perspective.

Authors:  Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Effective population management practices in diabetes care - an observational study.

Authors:  Anne Frølich; Jim Bellows; Bo Friis Nielsen; Per Bruun Brockhoff; Martin Hefford
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Mandatory quality reports in Germany from the hospitals' point of view: a cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Silke Auras; Werner de Cruppé; Karl Blum; Max Geraedts
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Intraclass reliability for assessing how well Taiwan constrained hospital-provided medical services using statistical process control chart techniques.

Authors:  Tsair-Wei Chien; Ming-Ting Chou; Wen-Chung Wang; Li-Shu Tsai; Weir-Sen Lin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh; Sonia Dalkin; Elizabeth Gibbons; Judy Wright; Jose Maria Valderas; David Meads; Nick Black
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2017-12-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.