Literature DB >> 12674229

A virtual photon energy fluence model for Monte Carlo dose calculation.

Matthias Fippel1, Freddy Haryanto, Oliver Dohm, Fridtjof Nüsslin, Stephan Kriesen.   

Abstract

The presented virtual energy fluence (VEF) model of the patient-independent part of the medical linear accelerator heads, consists of two Gaussian-shaped photon sources and one uniform electron source. The planar photon sources are located close to the bremsstrahlung target (primary source) and to the flattening filter (secondary source), respectively. The electron contamination source is located in the plane defining the lower end of the filter. The standard deviations or widths and the relative weights of each source are free parameters. Five other parameters correct for fluence variations, i.e., the horn or central depression effect. If these parameters and the field widths in the X and Y directions are given, the corresponding energy fluence distribution can be calculated analytically and compared to measured dose distributions in air. This provides a method of fitting the free parameters using the measurements for various square and rectangular fields and a fixed number of monitor units. The next step in generating the whole set of base data is to calculate monoenergetic central axis depth dose distributions in water which are used to derive the energy spectrum by deconvolving the measured depth dose curves. This spectrum is also corrected to take the off-axis softening into account. The VEF model is implemented together with geometry modules for the patient specific part of the treatment head (jaws, multileaf collimator) into the XVMC dose calculation engine. The implementation into other Monte Carlo codes is possible based on the information in this paper. Experiments are performed to verify the model by comparing measured and calculated dose distributions and output factors in water. It is demonstrated that open photon beams of linear accelerators from two different vendors are accurately simulated using the VEF model. The commissioning procedure of the VEF model is clinically feasible because it is based on standard measurements in air and water. It is also useful for IMRT applications because a full Monte Carlo simulation of the treatment head would be too time-consuming for many small fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12674229     DOI: 10.1118/1.1543152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  18F-FET-PET-based dose painting by numbers with protons.

Authors:  Mark Rickhey; Zdenek Morávek; Christoph Eilles; Oliver Koelbl; Ludwig Bogner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Four-dimensional dosimetry validation and study in lung radiotherapy using deformable image registration and Monte Carlo techniques.

Authors:  Tzung-Chi Huang; Ji-An Liang; Thomas Dilling; Tung-Hsin Wu; Geoffrey Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Spectral method for the correction of the Cerenkov light effect in plastic scintillation detectors: a comparison study of calibration procedures and validation in Cerenkov light-dominated situations.

Authors:  Mathieu Guillot; Luc Gingras; Louis Archambault; Sam Beddar; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Monte Carlo systems used for treatment planning and dose verification.

Authors:  Lorenzo Brualla; Miguel Rodriguez; Antonio M Lallena
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations.

Authors:  Scott E Davidson; Jing Cui; Stephen Kry; Joseph O Deasy; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Milos Vicic; R Allen White; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  CT-myelography for high-dose irradiation of spinal and paraspinal tumors with helical tomotherapy: revival of an old tool.

Authors:  Matthias Uhl; Florian Sterzing; Gregor Habl; Kai Schubert; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Jürgen Debus; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool.

Authors:  Austin M Faught; Scott E Davidson; Jonas Fontenot; Stephen F Kry; Carol Etzel; Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Clinical relevance of different dose calculation strategies for mediastinal IMRT in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  J Koeck; Y Abo-Madyan; H T Eich; F Stieler; J Fleckenstein; J Kriz; R-P Mueller; F Wenz; F Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Comparison of normal tissue dose calculation methods for epidemiological studies of radiotherapy patients.

Authors:  Matthew M Mille; Jae Won Jung; Choonik Lee; Gleb A Kuzmin; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 1.394

10.  Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam based optimization of stereotactic lung IMRT.

Authors:  Marcin Sikora; Jan Muzik; Matthias Söhn; Martin Weinmann; Markus Alber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.