Literature DB >> 1267207

Pressure antagonism of barbiturate anesthesia.

P M Winter, R A Smith, M Smith, E I Eger.   

Abstract

The losses of righting reflex produced by various doses of phenobarbital in mice at 1 atm O2 versus 1 atm O2 plus 102 atm He were determined. The resulting dose-response curve at pressure gave an ED50 that was 64 per cent larger than the ED50 at 1 atm. This increment is essentially the same as that found for gaseous anesthetics under similar test conditions. The quantitative similarity of the results of pressure reversals of barbiturate and inhalational anesthetics suggests that the mechanisms or sites of action of these agents are similar. However, the dose-response curve at 103 atm was steeper than that at 1 atm. This raises an alternative possibility that anesthetics and pressure bear no mechanistic relationship to each other, but rather that pressure produces a generalized central nervous system stimulation that would antagonize any depressant effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1267207     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197605000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  5 in total

1.  Anesthetic inhibition of firefly luciferase, a protein model for general anesthesia, does not exhibit pressure reversal.

Authors:  G W Moss; W R Lieb; N P Franks
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The physiological effects of hydrostatic pressure are not equivalent to those of helium pressure on Rana pipiens.

Authors:  B A Dodson; Z W Furmaniuk; K W Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Molecular mechanisms of action of general anesthetics.

Authors:  B A Dodson; J Moss
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Effects of ketamine and of high pressure on the responses to gamma-aminobutyric acid of the rat superior cervical ganglion in vitro.

Authors:  H J Little
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  The effects of anaesthetics and high pressure on the responses of the rat superior cervical ganglion in vitro.

Authors:  H J Little; D L Thomas
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.182

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.