David J Kay1, Vishvesh Mehta, Ari J Goldsmith. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York-Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, USA. davidkay@pol.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the current practices of preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and postoperative treatment of pediatric adenotonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-one-item survey measuring the frequency of different evaluations, procedures, and treatments performed, including selected case scenarios, with all items scored on a five-point ordinal scale ranking frequency. METHODS: The entire membership of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) and active fellows and members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) residing in New York state were anonymously surveyed through mail-in questionnaires. RESULTS: History alone was the most frequent modality for diagnosing both adenoid enlargement and obstructive sleep apnea. The most common preoperative laboratory test ordered before an adenotonsillectomy is a complete blood cell count; ASPO members ordered fewer preoperative laboratory tests than AAO-HNS members. Unipolar cautery is the most frequently used tonsillectomy technique, and curettage followed by cautery is the most popular adenoidectomy technique. Steroids are the most common intraoperative medication administered during an adenotonsillectomy, and office visits remain the most frequently used methods of assessing adenotonsillectomy patients postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are statistically significant trends uncovered by the survey, the results reflect a lack of consensus regarding adenotonsillectomy management. Further randomized controlled trials or large-scale outcomes projects are much needed to evaluate critically the current practices of pediatric adenotonsillectomies. Additional efforts may also be required to use the information from these studies in effecting changes in actual practice patterns, moving us toward a more evidence-based paradigm of treating pediatric adenotonsillar disease.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the current practices of preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and postoperative treatment of pediatric adenotonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-one-item survey measuring the frequency of different evaluations, procedures, and treatments performed, including selected case scenarios, with all items scored on a five-point ordinal scale ranking frequency. METHODS: The entire membership of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) and active fellows and members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) residing in New York state were anonymously surveyed through mail-in questionnaires. RESULTS: History alone was the most frequent modality for diagnosing both adenoid enlargement and obstructive sleep apnea. The most common preoperative laboratory test ordered before an adenotonsillectomy is a complete blood cell count; ASPO members ordered fewer preoperative laboratory tests than AAO-HNS members. Unipolar cautery is the most frequently used tonsillectomy technique, and curettage followed by cautery is the most popular adenoidectomy technique. Steroids are the most common intraoperative medication administered during an adenotonsillectomy, and office visits remain the most frequently used methods of assessing adenotonsillectomy patients postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are statistically significant trends uncovered by the survey, the results reflect a lack of consensus regarding adenotonsillectomy management. Further randomized controlled trials or large-scale outcomes projects are much needed to evaluate critically the current practices of pediatric adenotonsillectomies. Additional efforts may also be required to use the information from these studies in effecting changes in actual practice patterns, moving us toward a more evidence-based paradigm of treating pediatric adenotonsillar disease.
Authors: K Scheckenbach; H Bier; T K Hoffmann; J P Windfuhr; M Bas; H-J Laws; C Plettenberg; M Wagenmann Journal: HNO Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 1.284