OBJECTIVE: The Colorado Child Health Plan Plus is a non-Medicaid state Child Health Insurance Plan. The objective of this study was to compare early enrolling (EE) children with uninsured children in low-income families (ULI) with respect to 1) sociodemographic factors and previous insurance, 2) health status, and 3) previous health care access and utilization. METHODS: Cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted during 1999 of 1) randomly selected EE children (n = 711) and 2) ULI children identified by random-dial survey (n = 105). RESULTS: Enrolling children were less likely to be Hispanic (32.7% vs 55.2%); 5.5% of EE versus 27.6% of ULI children had never been insured. Prevalence of chronic conditions was similar (16.2% of EE vs 13.5% of ULI children), but learning/behavioral difficulties (9.7% of EE vs 18.6% of ULI) and fair/poor health (5.4% of EE vs 17.2% of ULI) were higher for uninsured children. In the previous year, 88.2% of EE versus 66.1% of ULI children had a usual source of care. The mean number of preventive visits was similar (1.4 vs 1.2), but the EE group reported a higher mean number of sick visits (2.0 vs 1.1), emergency visits (0.48 vs 0.15), and hospitalizations (0.09 vs 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the first 2 years of the program, Child Health Plan Plus is not yet reaching the "hard-to-reach" but, rather, disproportionately high numbers of non-Hispanic children who already have a usual source of care and recent insurance. EE children did not have higher rates of chronic conditions but did demonstrate higher utilization before enrollment, possibly reflecting patterns of enrollment into the program.
OBJECTIVE: The Colorado Child Health Plan Plus is a non-Medicaid state Child Health Insurance Plan. The objective of this study was to compare early enrolling (EE) children with uninsured children in low-income families (ULI) with respect to 1) sociodemographic factors and previous insurance, 2) health status, and 3) previous health care access and utilization. METHODS: Cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted during 1999 of 1) randomly selected EE children (n = 711) and 2) ULI children identified by random-dial survey (n = 105). RESULTS: Enrolling children were less likely to be Hispanic (32.7% vs 55.2%); 5.5% of EE versus 27.6% of ULI children had never been insured. Prevalence of chronic conditions was similar (16.2% of EE vs 13.5% of ULI children), but learning/behavioral difficulties (9.7% of EE vs 18.6% of ULI) and fair/poor health (5.4% of EE vs 17.2% of ULI) were higher for uninsured children. In the previous year, 88.2% of EE versus 66.1% of ULI children had a usual source of care. The mean number of preventive visits was similar (1.4 vs 1.2), but the EE group reported a higher mean number of sick visits (2.0 vs 1.1), emergency visits (0.48 vs 0.15), and hospitalizations (0.09 vs 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In the first 2 years of the program, Child Health Plan Plus is not yet reaching the "hard-to-reach" but, rather, disproportionately high numbers of non-Hispanic children who already have a usual source of care and recent insurance. EE children did not have higher rates of chronic conditions but did demonstrate higher utilization before enrollment, possibly reflecting patterns of enrollment into the program.
Authors: Robert D Keeley; Alison Birchard; Perry Dickinson; John Steiner; L Miriam Dickinson; Susan Rymer; Blake Palmer; Torri Derback; Allison Kempe Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.166