Literature DB >> 12670368

Properties of a new intravenous immunoglobulin (IGIV-C, 10%) produced by virus inactivation with caprylate and column chromatography.

W Lebing1, K M Remington, C Schreiner, H-I Paul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Current manufacture of intravenous immunoglobulin (Gamimune N) uses four cold-ethanol precipitation steps and solvent-detergent treatment. Our objective was to design a new manufacturing process to maximize immunoglobulin G (IgG) purity, achieve robust viral safety, preserve all the biological activities of antibody and avoid unnecessary protein loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The new process combines multiple functions in single steps. Caprylate is added to precipitate non-IgG proteins and to inactivate enveloped viruses. Two successive anion-exchange columns are used to purify IgG and remove caprylate. The new product, IGIV-C (Gamunex, 10%) is formulated with glycine at 100 mg/ml IgG, pH 4.25. Vials are incubated for 21 days at 23-27 degrees C in a final virus-inactivation step.
RESULTS: Compared with the process for production of Gamimune N, that for IGIV-C requires a shorter production time, achieves more robust virus inactivation, increases IGIV yield from plasma, improves physiological IgG subclass distribution (resulting in higher levels of IgG4), and improves purity, with lower levels of IgA (40 microg/ml), IgM (< 2 microg/ml) and albumin (< 20 microg/ml). Antibody binding, opsonization and protective activities are similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the current commercial process, the new IGIV-C manufacturing process produces a more highly purified preparation that contains slightly higher levels of IgG4 and retains antibody activities required for clinical efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12670368     DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00285.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vox Sang        ISSN: 0042-9007            Impact factor:   2.144


  19 in total

Review 1.  Recovery and purification process development for monoclonal antibody production.

Authors:  Hui F Liu; Junfen Ma; Charles Winter; Robert Bayer
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Intravenous immunoglobulin in immunodeficiency states: state of the art.

Authors:  Elias Toubi; Amos Etzioni
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Porcine parvovirus removal using trimer and biased hexamer peptides.

Authors:  Caryn L Heldt; Patrick V Gurgel; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Ruben G Carbonell
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Influence of peptide ligand surface density and ethylene oxide spacer arm on the capture of porcine parvovirus.

Authors:  Caryn L Heldt; Patrick V Gurgel; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Ruben G Carbonell
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

5.  Safety and tolerability of increased rate of infusion of intravenous immunoglobulin G, 10% in antibody-deficient patients.

Authors:  Erwin W Gelfand; Kim Hanna
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 8.542

6.  Minipool caprylic acid fractionation of plasma using disposable equipment: a practical method to enhance immunoglobulin supply in developing countries.

Authors:  Magdy El-Ekiaby; Mariángela Vargas; Makram Sayed; George Gorgy; Hadi Goubran; Mirjana Radosevic; Thierry Burnouf
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  Process steps for the fractionation of immunoglobulin (Ig) G depleted of IgA, isoagglutinins, and devoid of in vitro thrombogenicity.

Authors:  Josephine H Cheng; Yu-Wen Wu; Chen-Yun Wang; Sharon S Wu; Cheum L Hong; Karen W Chan; Leo X Liao; Xisheng Cao; Bin Wang; Thierry Burnouf
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Impact of intravenous immunoglobulin on the dopaminergic system and immune response in the acute MPTP mouse model of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Isabelle St-Amour; Mélanie Bousquet; Isabelle Paré; Janelle Drouin-Ouellet; Francesca Cicchetti; Renée Bazin; Frédéric Calon
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 8.322

9.  In vitro and in vivo properties differ among liquid intravenous immunoglobulin preparations.

Authors:  F Dhainaut; P-O Guillaumat; H Dib; G Perret; A Sauger; C de Coupade; M Beaudet; M Elzaabi; L Mouthon
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 10.  The Production Processes and Biological Effects of Intravenous Immunoglobulin.

Authors:  Ana Filipa Barahona Afonso; Cristina Maria Pires João
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2016-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.