Literature DB >> 12670162

Comparison of the physicochemical properties and pasting characteristics of flour and starch from red and white sweet potato cultivars.

Oluwatooyin F Osundahunsi1, Tayo N Fagbemi, Ellina Kesselman, Eyal Shimoni.   

Abstract

This research characterized flour and raw starches isolated from red and white sweet potato cultivars. Their composition, determined by proximate analysis, is typical of sweet potato cultivars. These cultivars have high amylose content (32-34%) and exhibit a Ca-type X-ray diffraction pattern. Similar gelatinization characteristics were detected for both starches with onset temperature of 67 degrees C and enthalpy of 10.5-11.0 J/g. Starches of both red and white cultivars had well-correlated (r (2) = 0.982) and high solubilization and swelling temperatures, starting at 80 degrees C. Pasting properties of the white cultivar exhibit lower tendency for retrogradation. Water and oil absorption capacities were low for both red and white flours. When parboiled, both cultivars showed improved water absorption capacity and decreased least gelation concentration. It is concluded that the white cultivar should be preferred when low retrogradation tendency is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12670162     DOI: 10.1021/jf0260139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  20 in total

1.  Preparation and characterization of physicochemical properties of glacial acetic acid modified Gadung (Diocorea hispida Dennst) flours.

Authors:  Andri Cahyo Kumoro; Rizka Amalia; Catarina Sri Budiyati; Diah Susetyo Retnowati; Ratnawati Ratnawati
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Physicochemical, Nutritional, and Antioxidant Properties in Seven Sweet Potato Flours.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Yan Gao; Bowen Deng; Weidong Ru; Chuan Tong; Jinsong Bao
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 3.  Impacts of Pretreatment Techniques on the Quality of Tuber Flours.

Authors:  Abebe Desalegn Melese; Ebisa Olika Keyata
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Quality attributes of sweet potato flour as influenced by variety, pretreatment and drying method.

Authors:  Ganiyat O Olatunde; Folake O Henshaw; Michael A Idowu; Keith Tomlins
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Chemical and structural properties of sweet potato starch treated with organic and inorganic acid.

Authors:  A Surendra Babu; R Parimalavalli; K Jagannadham; J Sudhakara Rao
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  Evaluation of metals in several varieties of sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas L.): comparative study.

Authors:  Gara Luis; Carmen Rubio; Angel J Gutiérrez; Dailos González-Weller; Consuelo Revert; Arturo Hardisson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Potassium Fertilization Stimulates Sucrose-to-Starch Conversion and Root Formation in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.).

Authors:  Yang Gao; Zhonghou Tang; Houqiang Xia; Minfei Sheng; Ming Liu; Shenyuan Pan; Zongyun Li; Jingran Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Hydration and Pasting Properties of Oat (Avena sativa) Flour.

Authors:  Induck Choi; Ok-Kyu Han; Jiyeon Chun; Chon-Sik Kang; Kyung-Hoon Kim; Yang-Kil Kim; Young-Keun Cheong; Tae-Il Park; Jae-Sung Choi; Kee-Jong Kim
Journal:  Prev Nutr Food Sci       Date:  2012-03

9.  Microbial contribution to spoilage of African breadfruit (Artocarpus communis, Forst) during storage.

Authors:  Olusegun B Ajayi; Tinuola T Adebolu
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  Nutritional, physicochemical, and functional properties of protein concentrate and isolate of newly-developed Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterrenea L.) cultivars.

Authors:  Olaposi R Adeleke; Oladipupo Q Adiamo; Olumide S Fawale
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 2.863

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.