PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to investigate spray-freezing into liquid (SFL) and atmospheric freeze-drying (ATMFD) as industrial processes for producing micronized SFL powders with enhanced aqueous dissolution. Micronized SFL powders dried by ATMFD were compared with vacuum freeze-dried SFL powders. METHOD: Danazol was formulated with polyvinyl alcohol (MW 22,000), polyvinylpyrrolidone K-15, and poloxamer 407 to produce micronized SFL powders that were freeze-dried under vacuum or dried by ATMFD. The powders were characterized using Karl-Fischer titration, gas chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, surface area, and dissolution testing (SLS 0.75%/Tris 1.21% buffer media). RESULTS: Micronized SFL powders containing amorphous drug were successfully dried using the ATMFD process. Micronized SFL powders contained less than 5% w/w and 50 ppm of residual water and organic solvent, respectively, which were similar to those contents detected in a co-ground physical mixture of similar composition. Micronized SFL powders dried by ATMFD had lower surface areas than powders produced by vacuum freeze-drying (5.7 vs. 8.9 m2/g) but significantly greater surface areas than the micronized bulk drug (0.5 m2/g) and co-ground physical mixture (1.9 m2/g). Rapid wetting and dissolution occurred when the SFL powders were introduced into the dissolution media. By 5 min, 100% dissolution of danazol from the ATMFD-micronized SFL powder had occurred, which was similar to the dissolution profile of the vacuum freeze-dried SFL powder. CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum freeze-drying is not a preferred technique in the pharmaceutical industry because of scalability and high-cost concerns. The ATMFD process enables commercialization of the SFL particle-engineering technology as a micronization method to enhance dissolution of hydrophobic drugs.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to investigate spray-freezing into liquid (SFL) and atmospheric freeze-drying (ATMFD) as industrial processes for producing micronized SFL powders with enhanced aqueous dissolution. Micronized SFL powders dried by ATMFD were compared with vacuum freeze-dried SFL powders. METHOD:Danazol was formulated with polyvinyl alcohol (MW 22,000), polyvinylpyrrolidone K-15, and poloxamer 407 to produce micronized SFL powders that were freeze-dried under vacuum or dried by ATMFD. The powders were characterized using Karl-Fischer titration, gas chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, surface area, and dissolution testing (SLS 0.75%/Tris 1.21% buffer media). RESULTS: Micronized SFL powders containing amorphous drug were successfully dried using the ATMFD process. Micronized SFL powders contained less than 5% w/w and 50 ppm of residual water and organic solvent, respectively, which were similar to those contents detected in a co-ground physical mixture of similar composition. Micronized SFL powders dried by ATMFD had lower surface areas than powders produced by vacuum freeze-drying (5.7 vs. 8.9 m2/g) but significantly greater surface areas than the micronized bulk drug (0.5 m2/g) and co-ground physical mixture (1.9 m2/g). Rapid wetting and dissolution occurred when the SFL powders were introduced into the dissolution media. By 5 min, 100% dissolution of danazol from the ATMFD-micronized SFL powder had occurred, which was similar to the dissolution profile of the vacuum freeze-dried SFL powder. CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum freeze-drying is not a preferred technique in the pharmaceutical industry because of scalability and high-cost concerns. The ATMFD process enables commercialization of the SFL particle-engineering technology as a micronization method to enhance dissolution of hydrophobic drugs.
Authors: K G Carrasquillo; A M Stanley; J C Aponte-Carro; P De Jésus; H R Costantino; C J Bosques; K Griebenow Journal: J Control Release Date: 2001-10-19 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: True L Rogers; Andrew C Nelsen; Jiahui Hu; Judith N Brown; Marazban Sarkari; Timothy J Young; Keith P Johnston; Robert O Williams Journal: Eur J Pharm Biopharm Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 5.571
Authors: True L Rogers; Ian B Gillespie; James E Hitt; Kevin L Fransen; Cindy A Crowl; Christopher J Tucker; Gary B Kupperblatt; Joe N Becker; Deb L Wilson; Clifford Todd; Charles F Broomall; Jonathan C Evans; Edmund J Elder Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Dalia A Gaber; Abdulrahman S Alhuwaymili; Hessah S Alhawas; Alhnouf A Almutiri; Amal M Alsubaiyel; Siham A Abdoun; Reem A Almutairi Journal: Drug Deliv Date: 2022-12 Impact factor: 6.419