L Tooth1, K McKenna, T Geraghty. 1. School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive study. OBJECTIVES: To describe patients' length of stay (LOS), functional status and discharge setting after rehabilitation and how degree of impairment (complete/incomplete paraplegia/tetraplegia) impacts on these outcomes. To compare actual LOS with estimated LOS. Estimated LOS was based on an Australian model, the Australian National Sub-acute and Non-acute Patient Classification System (AN-SNAP), which classifies patients using admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM trade mark ) scores. To further describe outcomes for each AN-SNAP class by degree of impairment. SETTING: Spinal Injuries Unit of major Metropolitan hospital in Brisbane, Australia. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 167 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Main outcome measures were rehabilitation LOS, discharge FIM trade mark scores and discharge setting. Injury measures were degree of impairment, acute LOS and rehabilitation admission FIM trade mark scores. Standard demographic measures were also collected. RESULTS: The median rehabilitation LOS was 83 days and mean discharge FIM trade mark scores 102 for all patients. These differed by impairment (incomplete paraplegia LOS 43, FIM 117; complete paraplegia LOS 96, FIM 109; incomplete tetraplegia LOS 64, FIM 100; complete tetraplegia LOS 206, FIM 78). Patients discharged to the community (noncare facility) ranged from 93% with incomplete paraplegia to 73% with complete tetraplegia. For patients in the three AN-SNAP classes with the lowest FIM scores, the actual LOS was up to twice the estimated LOS. A large variability in discharge outcomes was found within individual AN-SNAP classes, despite similar FIM trade mark scores on admission. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation outcomes differed substantially by impairment. The variability in outcomes for patients within the same AN-SNAP class questions the ability of this system to accurately predict LOS, and therefore cost of rehabilitation services, for patients with traumatic SCI in Australia.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive study. OBJECTIVES: To describe patients' length of stay (LOS), functional status and discharge setting after rehabilitation and how degree of impairment (complete/incomplete paraplegia/tetraplegia) impacts on these outcomes. To compare actual LOS with estimated LOS. Estimated LOS was based on an Australian model, the Australian National Sub-acute and Non-acute Patient Classification System (AN-SNAP), which classifies patients using admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM trade mark ) scores. To further describe outcomes for each AN-SNAP class by degree of impairment. SETTING: Spinal Injuries Unit of major Metropolitan hospital in Brisbane, Australia. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 167 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Main outcome measures were rehabilitation LOS, discharge FIM trade mark scores and discharge setting. Injury measures were degree of impairment, acute LOS and rehabilitation admission FIM trade mark scores. Standard demographic measures were also collected. RESULTS: The median rehabilitation LOS was 83 days and mean discharge FIM trade mark scores 102 for all patients. These differed by impairment (incomplete paraplegia LOS 43, FIM 117; complete paraplegia LOS 96, FIM 109; incomplete tetraplegia LOS 64, FIM 100; complete tetraplegia LOS 206, FIM 78). Patients discharged to the community (noncare facility) ranged from 93% with incomplete paraplegia to 73% with complete tetraplegia. For patients in the three AN-SNAP classes with the lowest FIM scores, the actual LOS was up to twice the estimated LOS. A large variability in discharge outcomes was found within individual AN-SNAP classes, despite similar FIM trade mark scores on admission. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation outcomes differed substantially by impairment. The variability in outcomes for patients within the same AN-SNAP class questions the ability of this system to accurately predict LOS, and therefore cost of rehabilitation services, for patients with traumatic SCI in Australia.
Authors: Tamra Keeney; Mary Slavin; Pamela Kisala; Pengsheng Ni; Allen W Heinemann; Susan Charlifue; Denise C Fyffe; Ralph J Marino; Leslie R Morse; Lynn A Worobey; Denise Tate; David Rosenblum; Ross Zafonte; David Tulsky; Alan M Jette Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-03-31 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Eileen van de Pol; Karen Lucas; Timothy Geraghty; Kiley Pershouse; Sandra Harding; Sridhar Atresh; Annemarie Wagemakers; Anthony C Smith Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 2.655