Literature DB >> 1266896

Conization as only treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.

B Bjerre, G Eliasson, F Linell, H Söderberg, N O Sjöberg.   

Abstract

Knife conization was performed in 2,099 cases with abnormal vaginal smears. The frequency of complications was low. Carcinoma in situ was diagnosed in 1,500 cases and follow-up showed that conization was curative in 87%. The curative rate was depending on whether the resection margins were free of pathologic epithelium or not. If smears were repeatedly negative the first year after conization a new diagnosis of cancer was made in 0.4%. It was not possible to decide whether these lesions were residual changes or true recurrences. Treatment of carcinoma in situ by conization has so far reduced the frequency of invasive cervical cancer by 60%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1266896     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(76)90584-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Minimally invasive therapy of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia for fertility preservation.

Authors:  Darko Milinovic; Drzislav Kalafatic; Damir Babic; Lidija Beketic Oreskovic; Helena Lovric Grsic; Slavko Oreskovic
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.

Authors:  G B Kristensen; L K Jensen; D Ejersbo; B Hølund
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Is conization appropriate treatment for cervical cancer in situ?

Authors:  B Lambert; S Rousseau; P Bielmann; E Lamoureux; Y Boivin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1982-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  [Treatment of carcinoma in situ. II. Evaluation by conization. Treatment after incomplete conization. Treatment by complete conization as only therapy. Conclusions (author's transl)].

Authors:  E Holzer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol       Date:  1979-09

5.  Cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative conization margin: negligible or not?

Authors:  Sokbom Kang
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Risk of recurrence after treatment of severe intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. A follow-up of 896 patients.

Authors:  J H Robertson; B E Woodend; E H Crozier; A Patterson
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1987-10

7.  Clinical and economic benefit of HPV-load testing in follow-up and management of women postcone biopsy for CIN2-3.

Authors:  B Almog; R Gamzu; J Bornstein; I Levin; O Fainaru; J Niv; J B Lessing; A Bar-Am
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The use of conization to identify and treat severe lesions among prediagnosed CIN1 and 2 patients in Japan.

Authors:  Mikio Mikami; Masae Ikeda; Hidetaka Sato; Haruko Iwase; Takayuki Enomoto; Yoichi Kobayashi; Hidetaka Katabuchi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.401

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.