Julia A Critchley1, Simon Capewell. 1. Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK. juliac@liverpool.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prospective cohort studies have made enormous contributions to our understanding of coronary heart disease (CHD) epidemiology in the UK. However, identification of cohorts and dissemination of key characteristics and results can be haphazard, and it is difficult to identify studies which are at the planning stage. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of cohort studies by searching MEDLINE and relevant websites and consulting key individuals. We included all large prospective UK cohort studies that focused on the development of CHD in predominantly healthy subjects. RESULTS: The MEDLINE search retrieved 1558 hits and we identified 39 cohorts that met inclusion criteria. 'Early' cohorts were important in defining the major risk factors for CHD, particularly smoking, cholesterol, blood pressure, physical activity and body mass index. Prospective cohort studies have subsequently appraised potentially important novel risk factors including nutritional status, genetic determinants, haemostatic factors, lipid sub-fractions, psychosocial factors and the 'life course' perspective. Psychosocial factors have been relatively neglected, as have women, ethnic minorities and the elderly. Key methodological issues include minimizing losses to follow up, standardized measurements, quality assurance systems, change in risk factors over time, residual confounding, regression dilution bias, detection of non-fatal events, measurement of quality of life, and generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The current and proposed prospective UK cohorts have sufficient power potentially to determine the importance of many traditional and newer CHD risk factors on cardiovascular risk in men, women and even ethnic minorities. However, secure financial support and hence sustainability will remain essential to maximize long-term benefits.
BACKGROUND: Prospective cohort studies have made enormous contributions to our understanding of coronary heart disease (CHD) epidemiology in the UK. However, identification of cohorts and dissemination of key characteristics and results can be haphazard, and it is difficult to identify studies which are at the planning stage. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of cohort studies by searching MEDLINE and relevant websites and consulting key individuals. We included all large prospective UK cohort studies that focused on the development of CHD in predominantly healthy subjects. RESULTS: The MEDLINE search retrieved 1558 hits and we identified 39 cohorts that met inclusion criteria. 'Early' cohorts were important in defining the major risk factors for CHD, particularly smoking, cholesterol, blood pressure, physical activity and body mass index. Prospective cohort studies have subsequently appraised potentially important novel risk factors including nutritional status, genetic determinants, haemostatic factors, lipid sub-fractions, psychosocial factors and the 'life course' perspective. Psychosocial factors have been relatively neglected, as have women, ethnic minorities and the elderly. Key methodological issues include minimizing losses to follow up, standardized measurements, quality assurance systems, change in risk factors over time, residual confounding, regression dilution bias, detection of non-fatal events, measurement of quality of life, and generalizability. CONCLUSIONS: The current and proposed prospective UK cohorts have sufficient power potentially to determine the importance of many traditional and newer CHD risk factors on cardiovascular risk in men, women and even ethnic minorities. However, secure financial support and hence sustainability will remain essential to maximize long-term benefits.
Authors: Sarah L Hardoon; Peter H Whincup; Lucy T Lennon; S Goya Wannamethee; Simon Capewell; Richard W Morris Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690