Literature DB >> 12668362

A 20-year longitudinal observational study of somatic antidepressant treatment effectiveness.

Andrew C Leon1, David A Solomon, Timothy I Mueller, Jean Endicott, John P Rice, Jack D Maser, William Coryell, Martin B Keller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This observational study examined the effectiveness of somatic antidepressant treatments as administered in the community.
METHOD: The study group consisted of 285 subjects with an intake diagnosis of major depressive disorder who had entered the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Depression Study as early as 1978, had at least one additional affective episode, and had been followed for up to 20 years, as recently as 1999. The characteristics that distinguished subjects receiving various levels of somatic antidepressant treatment were accounted for in what was called a propensity for treatment intensity model. The effectiveness of somatic antidepressant treatment during major affective episodes was then examined.
RESULTS: Those who received higher levels of antidepressant treatment tended to have more prior episodes, more severe depressive symptoms, and more intensive somatic therapy during prior episodes and prior well intervals than those who received lower levels. Treatment effectiveness analyses that were stratified by propensity for treatment intensity demonstrated that those who received higher levels of antidepressant treatment were significantly more likely to recover from affective episodes. In contrast, those treated with lower levels were no more likely to recover than those who did not receive somatic treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the indications of more severe depressive illness, those who received higher levels of somatic antidepressant treatment were more likely to recover from recurrent affective episodes. Results from this observational study extend the generalizability of reports from randomized clinical trials of antidepressants to a wider, more representative group of individuals who suffer from major depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12668362     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  13 in total

Review 1.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Pediatric bipolar disease: current and future perspectives for study of its long-term course and treatment.

Authors:  Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher; Neal Ryan; David Axelson; Sylvia Valeri; Henrietta Leonard; Satish Iyengar; Mary Kay Gill; Jeffrey Hunt; Martin Keller
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.744

3.  Three-Year long-term outcome of 458 naturalistically treated inpatients with major depressive episode: severe relapse rates and risk factors.

Authors:  Florian Seemüller; Sebastian Meier; Michael Obermeier; Richard Musil; Michael Bauer; Mazda Adli; Klaus Kronmüller; Florian Holsboer; Peter Brieger; Gerd Laux; Wolfram Bender; Isabella Heuser; Joachim Zeiler; Wolfgang Gaebel; Michael Riedel; Peter Falkai; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 4.  A primary care focus on the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Karen Weihs; Jonathan M Wert
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.378

5.  Antidepressants and risks of suicide and suicide attempts: a 27-year observational study.

Authors:  Andrew C Leon; David A Solomon; Chunshan Li; Jess G Fiedorowicz; W H Coryell; Jean Endicott; Martin B Keller
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.384

6.  Antiepileptic drugs for bipolar disorder and the risk of suicidal behavior: a 30-year observational study.

Authors:  Andrew C Leon; David A Solomon; Chunshan Li; Jess G Fiedorowicz; William H Coryell; Jean Endicott; Martin B Keller
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Does major depressive disorder change with age?

Authors:  W Coryell; D Solomon; A Leon; J G Fiedorowicz; P Schettler; L Judd; M Keller
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  The course of major depressive disorder from childhood to young adulthood: Recovery and recurrence in a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Maria Kovacs; Scott Obrosky; Charles George
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Anxiety and outcome in bipolar disorder.

Authors:  William Coryell; David A Solomon; Jess G Fiedorowicz; Jean Endicott; Pamela J Schettler; Lewis L Judd
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  A brief motivational intervention for enhancing medication adherence for adolescents with bipolar disorder: A pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Tina R Goldstein; Megan L Krantz; Rachael K Fersch-Podrat; Nina J Hotkowski; John Merranko; Loren Sobel; David Axelson; Boris Birmaher; Antoine Douaihy
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.839

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.