Literature DB >> 12668296

Comparison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube in an urban emergency medical services system run by physicians.

Werner Rabitsch1, Peter Schellongowski, Thomas Staudinger, Roland Hofbauer, Viktor Dufek, Bettina Eder, Harald Raab, Rainer Thell, Ernst Schuster, Michael Frass.   

Abstract

This prospective randomised study was performed to compare the use of the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube(R) (ETC; Tyco Healthcare, Mansfield, MA; http://www.combitube.org) with a conventional tracheal airway (ETA) for airway management by experienced physicians of the Emergency Medical Services System of the City of Vienna in the prehospital setting. Access to the patient's head, time of arrival of the ambulance, ease of insertion, time of insertion, potential substitution by the alternate airway, efficacy of adrenaline (epinephrine) administered via the airway, survival to the intensive care unit (ICU) ward and survival to discharge from the hospital were evaluated. One hundred and seventy-two non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients (131 males, 41 females) were enrolled in this study during a 12 months period. In 83 patients (48.3%), the conventional ETA (group 1) was used for the initial intubation attempt which was successful in 78 patients (94%). The remaining five patients of group 1 could not be intubated with an ETA, but were successfully managed with the ETC. Eighty-nine patients (51.7%) were intubated with the ETC (group 2) as first choice (79 in oesophageal position (89%); eight in tracheal position: (9%)), which was successful in 87 (98%) patients. The remaining two patients in group 2 (2%) were successfully managed with the ETA. Success of intubation and ventilation with ETC was comparable to the ETA. Recorded time of insertion was shorter with the ETC versus ETA (P<0.05). The Combitube worked well in cases of difficult access to the patient's head and in bleeding and vomiting patients. Both devices served as successful substitutes for each other. Adrenaline (epinephrine) applied via ETC with a 10-fold dosage was as effective as via the conventional ETA. To our knowledge this is the first study using physicians comparing ETC and ETA in the prehospital setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12668296     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00435-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Methods of airway management in prehospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  W Keul; M Bernhard; A Völkl; R Gust; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Using a laryngeal tube during cardiac arrest reduces "no flow time" in a manikin study: a comparison between laryngeal tube and endotracheal tube.

Authors:  Christoph H R Wiese; Utz Bartels; Anna Bergmann; Ingo Bergmann; Jan Bahr; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  CT imaging of extraglottic airway device-pictorial review.

Authors:  Tatsuya Norii; Yohsuke Makino; Kana Unuma; Natalie L Adolphi; Danielle Albright; David P Sklar; Cameron Crandall; Darren Braude
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-02-02

Review 4.  [The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements].

Authors:  V Wenzel; S Russo; H R Arntz; J Bahr; M A Baubin; B W Böttiger; B Dirks; V Dörges; C Eich; M Fischer; B Wolcke; S Schwab; W G Voelckel; H W Gervais
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Out-of-hospital emergency medicine in Germany, Austria and Switzerland : randomized prospective studies from 1990 to 2012].

Authors:  J Ausserer; T Abt; K H Stadlbauer; P Paal; J Kreutziger; K H Lindner; V Wenzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Association Between Tracheal Intubation During Adult In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Survival.

Authors:  Lars W Andersen; Asger Granfeldt; Clifton W Callaway; Steven M Bradley; Jasmeet Soar; Jerry P Nolan; Tobias Kurth; Michael W Donnino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

8.  Evaluation of the oesophageal-tracheal double-lumen tube (Combitube) during general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Werner Rabitsch; Peter Krafft; Franz X Lackner; Reinhard Frenzer; Roland Hofbauer; Camillo Sherif; Michael Frass
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-02-16       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 9.  Emergency intubation for acutely ill and injured patients.

Authors:  F Lecky; D Bryden; R Little; N Tong; C Moulton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

10.  Maxillofacial trauma patient: coping with the difficult airway.

Authors:  Amir A Krausz; Imad Abu El-Naaj; Michal Barak
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.