Literature DB >> 12667079

Redox potential of quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: dependence on protonation of Glu-L212 and Asp-L213.

Hiroshi Ishikita1, Giulia Morra, Ernst-Walter Knapp.   

Abstract

The absolute values of the one-electron redox potentials of the two quinones (Q(A) and Q(B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were calculated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation at pH 7.0. The redox potential for Q(A) was calculated to be between -173 and -160 mV, which is close to the lowest measured values that are assumed to refer to nonequilibrated protonation patterns in the redox state Q(A)(-). The redox potential of quinone Q(B) is found to be about 160-220 mV larger for the light-exposed than for the dark-adapted structure. These values of the redox potentials are obtained if Asp-L213 is nearly protonated (probability 0.75-1.0) before and after electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), while Glu-L212 is partially protonated (probability 0.6) in the initial state Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and fully protonated in the final state Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-). Conversely, if the charge state of the quinones is varied from Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) to Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) corresponding to the electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), Asp-L213 remains protonated, while Glu-L212 changes its protonation state from 0.15 H(+) to fully protonated. In agreement with results from FTIR spectra, there is proton uptake at Glu-L212 going along with the electron transfer, whereas Asp-L213 does not change its protonation state. However, in our simulations Asp-L213 is considered to be protonated rather than ionized as deduced from FTIR spectra. The calculated redox potential of Q(A) shows little dependence on the charge state of Asp-L213, which is due to a strong coupling with the protonation state of Asp-M17 but increases by 50 mV if Glu-L212 changes from the ionized to the protonated charge state. Both are in agreement with fluorescence measurements observing the decay of SP(+)Q(A)(-) in a wide pH regime. The computed difference in redox potential of Q(B) in the light-exposed and dark-adapted structure was traced back to the hydrogen bond of Q(B) with His-L190 that is lost in the dark-adapted structure and the charge of the non-heme iron atom, which is closer to Q(B) in the light-exposed than in the dark-adapted structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12667079     DOI: 10.1021/bi026781t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  14 in total

1.  Induced conformational changes upon Cd2+ binding at photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ishikita; Ernst-Walter Knapp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Stigmatellin probes the electrostatic potential in the QB site of the photosynthetic reaction center.

Authors:  László Gerencsér; Bogáta Boros; Valerie Derrien; Deborah K Hanson; Colin A Wraight; Pierre Sebban; Péter Maróti
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Dynamical theory of primary processes of charge separation in the photosynthetic reaction center.

Authors:  Victor D Lakhno
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms for generating transmembrane proton gradients.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Muhamed Amin; Xuyu Zhu; Jianxun Lu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-03-16

Review 5.  The nonheme iron in photosystem II.

Authors:  Frank Müh; Athina Zouni
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Factors influencing the energetics of electron and proton transfers in proteins. What can be learned from calculations.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Junjun Mao; Yifan Song; Jinrang Kim
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-06-17

7.  Modeling binding kinetics at the Q(A) site in bacterial reaction centers.

Authors:  Jennifer Madeo; M R Gunner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  MCCE2: improving protein pKa calculations with extensive side chain rotamer sampling.

Authors:  Yifan Song; Junjun Mao; M R Gunner
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Factors that differentiate the H-bond strengths of water near the Schiff bases in bacteriorhodopsin and Anabaena sensory rhodopsin.

Authors:  Keisuke Saito; Hideki Kandori; Hiroshi Ishikita
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Modification of quinone electrochemistry by the proteins in the biological electron transfer chains: examples from photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Jennifer Madeo; Zhenyu Zhu
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.