Literature DB >> 12666859

Initial in vitro evaluation of DIAGNOdent for detecting secondary carious lesions associated with resin composite restorations.

Daniel W Boston1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential of DIAGNOdent (DD) readings for detecting secondary enamel and dentin carious lesions associated with resin composite restorations in a set of preserved extracted adult teeth. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Thirty test sites adjacent to resin composite restorations in 15 extracted teeth were evaluated visually and with DD readings for enamel and dentin caries. The results were compared to gold standard diagnosis determined by sectioning through each site and subsequent microscopic observation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and likelihood ratios at optimum threshold values for enamel and dentin caries were determined. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare visual and DD diagnostic methods.
RESULTS: Histologic incidence of enamel caries was 20% and dentin caries was 36.67%. All composite restorations in the sample teeth fluoresced (range 5 to 22). For enamel caries detection with DD, the optimum threshold of > or = 26 produced a sensitivity of .67 and a specificity of .79. For dentin caries detection with DD, the optimum threshold of > or = 22 produced a sensitivity of .73 and a specificity of .84. ROC analysis showed that the DD readings do contain diagnostic information. DD readings for dentin caries diagnosis produced better diagnostic results compared to visual readings for the 30 test sites in the study, but these results were not significantly different.
CONCLUSION: DIAGNOdent readings may have potential for resin composite secondary enamel and dentin carious lesion detection. DIAGNOdent instrument design factors and technique should be optimized to improve performance prior to clinical trial for this application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12666859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quintessence Int        ISSN: 0033-6572            Impact factor:   1.677


  11 in total

1.  Caries detection under composite restorations by laser fluorescence and digital radiography.

Authors:  Suwadee Kositbowornchai; Chotikpanich Sukanya; Tangkittikasem Tidarat; Thongsombat Chanoggarn
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Improved detection of subgingival calculus by laser fluorescence over differential reflectometry.

Authors:  Fardad Shakibaie; Kristina Law; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Performance differences in the detection of subgingival calculus by laser fluorescence devices.

Authors:  Fardad Shakibaie; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Near-infrared imaging of secondary caries lesions around composite restorations at wavelengths from 1300-1700-nm.

Authors:  Jacob C Simon; Seth A Lucas; Robert C Lee; Cynthia L Darling; Michal Staninec; Ram Vaderhobli; Roger Pelzner; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 5.  Evaluation of Accuracy of DIAGNOdent in Diagnosis of Primary and Secondary Caries in Comparison to Conventional Methods.

Authors:  Hanieh Nokhbatolfoghahaie; Marzieh Alikhasi; Nasim Chiniforush; Farzaneh Khoei; Nassimeh Safavi; Behnoush Yaghoub Zadeh
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

6.  In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of DIAGNOdent and Digital Radiography for Detection of Secondary Proximal Caries Adjacent to Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Zahra Ghoncheh; Zahra Zonouzy; Nazanin Kiomarsi; Mohammad Javad Kharazifar; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-27

7.  Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Patrick A Fee; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  In Vitro Detection of Caries Around Amalgam Restorations Using Four Different Modalities.

Authors:  Tamara E Abrams; Stephen H Abrams; Koneswaran S Sivagurunathan; Josh D Silvertown; Warren M P Hellen; Gary I Elman; Bennett T Amaechi
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2017-12-12

9.  Comparison of micro-CT imaging and histology for approximal caries detection.

Authors:  C Boca; B Truyen; L Henin; A G Schulte; V Stachniss; N De Clerck; J Cornelis; P Bottenberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  An in vivo comparison of two diagnostic methods in secondary caries detection.

Authors:  Kazem Saber Hamishaki; Nasim Chiniforush; Abbas Monzavi; Mohammad Javad Khazarazifard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.