Literature DB >> 12666772

Auditory and visual naming tests: normative and patient data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue.

Marla J Hamberger1, William T Seidel.   

Abstract

Naming is typically assessed with visual naming tasks, yet, some patients with genuine word-finding difficulty (evident in auditorily based discourse) show minimal difficulty on such measures. Evidence from cortical mapping, brain imaging and neuropsychological studies suggests that auditory naming measures might provide more relevant or at least, complementary information. We developed comparable auditory and visual naming tests and present normative data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue responses based on 100 controls. Test validity was supported by findings that left temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients (i.e., a population with expected naming difficulty) performed more poorly on auditory but not visual naming compared to right TLE patients (i.e., a population without expected naming difficulty). Internal and test-retest reliability coefficients were reasonable. Finally, test utility was assessed on an individual basis, and auditory but not visual naming performance predicted impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12666772     DOI: 10.1017/s135561770393013x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  47 in total

1.  Auditory confrontation naming in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jason Brandt; Arnold Bakker; David Aaron Maroof
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.535

2.  Hippocampal removal affects visual but not auditory naming.

Authors:  Marla J Hamberger; William T Seidel; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Differences in functional MR imaging activation patterns associated with confrontation naming and responsive naming.

Authors:  Sarah Tomaszewki Farias; Gregory Harrington; Catherine Broomand; Maysud Seyal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  What's in a word? (... and why it matters).

Authors:  Bruce Hermann
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.500

5.  Role of frontotemporal fiber tract integrity in task-switching performance of healthy controls and patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  N Erkut Kucukboyaci; H M Girard; D J Hagler; J Kuperman; E S Tecoma; V J Iragui; E Halgren; C R McDonald
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 6.  Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: retrieval, behavior, and experience.

Authors:  Bennett L Schwartz; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-07

Review 7.  Update on epilepsy and cerebral localization.

Authors:  Adam L Hartman; Ronald P Lesser
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Multimodal imaging of language reorganization in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan A Chang; Nobuko Kemmotsu; Kelly M Leyden; N Erkut Kucukboyaci; Vicente J Iragui; Evelyn S Tecoma; Leena Kansal; Marc A Norman; Rachelle Compton; Tobin J Ehrlich; Vedang S Uttarwar; Anny Reyes; Brianna M Paul; Carrie R McDonald
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Preserved meaning in the context of impaired naming in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Michele Miozzo; Marla J Hamberger
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Multimodality word-finding distinctions in cortical stimulation mapping.

Authors:  Sandra Serafini; Merlise Clyde; Matt Tolson; Michael M Haglund
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.