Literature DB >> 12666710

Comparison of 2 commercially available chlorhexidine mouthrinses.

Jan A M Keijser1, Herman Verkade, Mark F Timmerman, Fridus A Van der Weijden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that lowering the concentration of chlorhexidine (CHX) in mouthrinses from 0.2% to 0.12% does not adversely affect inhibition of plaque accumulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibition of plaque growth by 2 commercially available mouthrinses used according to the manufacturers' instructions, one with a 30-second and one with a 60-second rinsing time.
METHODS: The clinical investigation was a single-blind, randomized study involving 80 volunteers (40 female, 40 male; mean age 25.7 years). At the start of the trial, all participants received a dental prophylaxis to remove all plaque deposits. Subjects refrained from all mechanical oral hygiene procedures, but rinsed twice a day with the allocated CHX mouthrinse over a period of 72 hours. The chlorhexidine preparations compared were a 0.12% concentration used at a 15 ml dose for a rinsing time of 30 seconds and a 0.2% concentration used at a dose of 10 ml for 60 seconds. After 72 hours, the plaque index (PI) from all volunteers was recorded at 6 sites per tooth. All participants received a questionnaire to evaluate their perception of the mouthrinses.
RESULTS: After 72 hours, the 15 ml/30 second/0.12% CHX group had a mean whole mouth PI of 1.65 (SD 0.31) compared with a mean PI of 1.60 (SD 0.40) for the 10 ml/60 second/0.2% CHX group. The difference in plaque scores between the groups was not statistically significant. Results from the questionnaire showed no significant difference between the groups for taste perception, duration of taste, alteration in taste, or perceived plaque reduction; however, the panelists preferred the shorter rinsing time of 30 seconds and, for this parameter, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this short-term study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between both commercially available CHX mouthrinses with respect to plaque inhibition, although both differed in concentration and rinsing time. The subject preference phase of the study indicated that the shorter rinsing time of 30 seconds was favored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12666710     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.2.214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  16 in total

1.  Analysis of the effects of chlorhexidine on oral biofilm vitality and structure based on viability profiling and an indicator of membrane integrity.

Authors:  C K Hope; M Wilson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Effect of mouthrinses on Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilms in a hydrodynamic model.

Authors:  Isabelle Sliepen; Mark Van Essche; Marc Quirynen; Wim Teughels
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health.

Authors:  Patrice James; Helen V Worthington; Carmel Parnell; Mairead Harding; Thomas Lamont; Andrea Cheung; Helen Whelton; Philip Riley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Comparison of the effectiveness of a commercially available herbal mouthrinse with chlorhexidine gluconate at the clinical and patient level.

Authors:  Ranjan Malhotra; Vishakha Grover; Anoop Kapoor; Divya Saxena
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2011-10

5.  Effect of hydrogen peroxide mouthwash as an adjunct to chlorhexidine on stains and plaque.

Authors:  Pravesh Jhingta; Ashu Bhardwaj; Deepak Sharma; Naresh Kumar; Vinay Kumar Bhardwaj; Sanjeev Vaid
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-07

6.  Biosynthesis, Characterization and Antibacterial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Derived from Endophytic Fungi against P. gingivalis.

Authors:  Kiran Rahul Halkai; Jayashree A Mudda; Vasundhara Shivanna; Vandana Rathod; Rahul S Halkai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Chlorhexidine alcohol base mouthrinse versus Chlorhexidine formaldehyde base mouthrinse efficacy on plaque control: double blind, randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Oumkeltoum Ennibi; Leila Lakhdar; Amal Bouziane; Yahia Bensouda; Redouane Abouqal
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-01-01

8.  Comparative study of 0.2% and 0.12% digluconate chlorhexidine mouth rinses on the level of dental staining and gingival indices.

Authors:  Mohammad Hassan Najafi; Morteza Taheri; Majid Reza Mokhtari; Ali Forouzanfar; Fateme Farazi; Mona Mirzaee; Zahra Ebrahiminik; Reza Mehrara
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-05

9.  Comparison of intraoral distribution of two commercially available chlorhexidine mouthrinses with and without alcohol at three different rinsing periods.

Authors:  L T Arunachalam; S Merugu; U Sudhakar
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2012-01

10.  Effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine in reducing microorganisms found in aerosol used for dental prophylaxis of patients submitted to fixed orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Isis Rodrigues Menezes dos Santos; Ana Cristina Azevedo Moreira; Myrela Galvão Cardoso Costa; Marcelo de Castellucci e Barbosa
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.