Tetsujl Fujita1, Yoji Yamazaki. 1. Department of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishishinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine correlation between number of total gastrectomies done by each of 21 surgeons and the early outcome of these operations. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: University hospital, Japan. PATIENTS: 136 patients treated by total gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a 4-year period. INTERVENTION: Univariate and multivariate analyses of the effect of each surgeon's volume on the early outcome of total gastrectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in the morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy between high-volume and low-volume surgeons. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the incidence of major complications of total gastrectomy between high-volume (7/66, 11%) and low-volume (17/70, 24%) surgeons (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Possible reasons for differences in outcome between high-volume and low-volume surgeons should be investigated in an attempt to define and describe the methods that are associated with the best outcome.
OBJECTIVE: To examine correlation between number of total gastrectomies done by each of 21 surgeons and the early outcome of these operations. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: University hospital, Japan. PATIENTS: 136 patients treated by total gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a 4-year period. INTERVENTION: Univariate and multivariate analyses of the effect of each surgeon's volume on the early outcome of total gastrectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in the morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy between high-volume and low-volume surgeons. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the incidence of major complications of total gastrectomy between high-volume (7/66, 11%) and low-volume (17/70, 24%) surgeons (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Possible reasons for differences in outcome between high-volume and low-volume surgeons should be investigated in an attempt to define and describe the methods that are associated with the best outcome.