Literature DB >> 12666072

Patients' attitudes about living donor transplantation and living donor nephrectomy.

Françoise G Pradel1, M Rhona Limcangco, C Daniel Mullins, Stephen T Bartlett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The growing shortage of organs available for transplantation has resulted in an increased use of living donors for kidney transplantation. The laparoscopic nephrectomy is a new procedure used to remove kidneys from donors. The study objective was to explore the attitudes of recipients and donors toward living donor kidney transplantation and the impact of the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on donors' and recipients' acceptance of living donor kidney transplantation.
METHODS: Tailored self-administered questionnaires were mailed to kidney donors, potential donors, recipients and potential recipients who visited the University of Maryland School of Medicine Division of Transplantation between January 1998 and May 2001.
RESULTS: The laparoscopic donor nephrectomy helped recipients and potential recipients with their decision to accept a kidney from a living donor (recipients: 53% strongly agreed, 36% agreed; potential recipients: 42% strongly agreed, 46% agreed). To a lesser extent, the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy assisted donors and potential donors with their decision to donate (donors: 19% strongly agreed, 20% agreed; potential donors: 20% strongly agreed, 20% agreed). Potential recipients and recipients identified 2 barriers to accepting living donor kidney transplantation: they were unwilling to accept a kidney if it meant this would financially burden their donors, and they worried that their donors might succumb to a future kidney problem.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the study found a positive attitude toward living donor kidney transplantation and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. This new surgical procedure seemed to positively influence recipients and potential recipients to accept a kidney. In contrast, it had less impact on donors' and potential donors' willingness to give their kidney.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12666072     DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(03)00033-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  17 in total

1.  A model for scoring and grading willingness of a potential living related donor.

Authors:  A A Al-Khader
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy on donor preoperative decision-making and postoperative quality of life and psychosocial outcomes.

Authors:  Christoph Troppmann; William K Johnston; Jonathan L Pierce; John P McVicar; Richard V Perez
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Protocol of the KTFT-TALK study to reduce racial disparities in kidney transplant evaluation and living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Kellee Bornemann; Emilee Croswell; Menna Abaye; Cindy L Bryce; Chung-Chou H Chang; Deborah S Good; Cathleen A Freehling Heiles; Mary Amanda Dew; L Ebony Boulware; Amit D Tevar; Larissa Myaskovsky
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  African American kidney transplant patients' perspectives on challenges in the living donation process.

Authors:  John C Sieverdes; Lynne S Nemeth; Gayenell S Magwood; Prabhakar K Baliga; Kenneth D Chavin; Ken J Ruggiero; Frank A Treiber
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.187

Review 5.  Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in live donor kidney transplantation: priorities for research and intervention.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; James R Rodrigue; Tanjala S Purnell; Keren Ladin; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.299

6.  Live donor champion: finding live kidney donors by separating the advocate from the patient.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Jonathan C Berger; Reside Lorie Ros; Lauren M Kucirka; Neha A Deshpande; Brian J Boyarsky; Robert A Montgomery; Erin C Hall; Nathan T James; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Mistrust, misperceptions, and miscommunication: a qualitative study of preferences about kidney transplantation among African Americans.

Authors:  M W Wachterman; E P McCarthy; E R Marcantonio; M Ersek
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Recruitment of live donors by candidates for kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Judy A Shea; Jeffrey S Berns; Maureen K Simon; Marshall M Joffe; Roy D Bloom; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Identifying potential kidney donors using social networking web sites.

Authors:  Alexander Chang; Emily E Anderson; Hang T Turner; David Shoham; Susan H Hou; Morgan Grams
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  The association of state and national legislation with living kidney donation rates in the United States: a national study.

Authors:  L E Boulware; M U Troll; L C Plantinga; N R Powe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.