Literature DB >> 12665716

In-hospital mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Veterans Health Administration and private sector hospitals.

Gary E Rosenthal1, Mary Vaughan Sarrazin, Edward L Hannan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Compare severity-adjusted in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in VA and private sector hospitals in two geographic regions. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study.
SUBJECTS: Consecutive male patients undergoing CABG from October 1993 to December 1996 in: 43 VA hospitals with cardiac surgery programs (n = 19,266); 32 hospitals in New York (NY) State (n = 44,247); and 10 hospitals in Northeast (NE) Ohio (n = 9696).
METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Logistic regression analysis identified 10 independent patient-level predictors (P <0.01) of in-hospital mortality: age, prior CABG, angioplasty before CABG, ejection fraction, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), cerebrovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
RESULTS: Unadjusted mortality was higher in VA patients than in NY or NE Ohio patients (3.5% vs. 2.0%, and 2.2%, respectively). Mortality decreased (P <0.001) with increasing volume (3.6% in low [<500 cases], 3.0% in moderate [500-1000 cases], and 2.0% in high [>1000 cases] volume hospitals). Median volume was lower in VA than private sector hospitals (410 vs. 1520), and no VA hospitals were classified as high volume. Adjusting for patient-level predictors and volume, the odds of death was higher in VA patients, relative to private sector patients (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11-1.63; P <0.001). In stratified analyses, the odds of death in VA patients was similar in low volume hospitals (OR, 0.86; P = 0.39), but higher in moderate volume hospitals (OR, 1.50; P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: VA hospitals had lower CABG volume than private sector hospitals in NY and NE Ohio, and higher in-hospital mortality. However, the difference in mortality was limited to moderate-volume hospitals. These findings suggest that hospital volume is an important modifier in comparisons of CABG mortality in VA and private sector hospitals. The higher mortality in VA hospitals may, in part, be caused by differences in surgical capacity and patient demand that lead to lower volume cardiac surgery programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12665716     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053231.70549.2D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  15 in total

1.  Are there gender differences in diabetes care among elderly Medicare enrolled veterans?

Authors:  Chin-Lin Tseng; Usha Sambamoorthi; Mangala Rajan; Anjali Tiwari; Susan Frayne; Patricia Findley; Leonard Pogach
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The Veterans Health Administration: an American success story?

Authors:  Adam Oliver
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  New York's statistical model accurately predicts mortality risk for veterans who obtain private sector CABG.

Authors:  William B Weeks; Dorothy A Bazos; David M Bott; Rosemary Lombardo; Michael J Racz; Edward L Hannan; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Fee-based care is important for access to prompt treatment of hip fractures among veterans.

Authors:  Kelly K Richardson; Peter Cram; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Acute myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes in specialty and general hospitals: analysis of state inpatient data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Levent Bayman; Joanna Popescu; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.

Authors:  Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Bonnie Wakefield; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Coronary artery disease is under-diagnosed and under-treated in advanced lung disease.

Authors:  Robert M Reed; Michael Eberlein; Reda E Girgis; Salman Hashmi; Aldo Iacono; Steven Jones; Giora Netzer; Steven Scharf
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Effects of cardiopulmonary bypass on pulmonary function in COPD patients undergoing beating heart coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Erdem Çetin; Levent Altinay
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 1.167

9.  Forced expiratory volume in one second predicts length of stay and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  David A McAllister; Sarah H Wild; John D MacLay; Andrew Robson; David E Newby; William MacNee; J Alastair Innes; Vipin Zamvar; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Survival enhancing indications for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in California.

Authors:  Zhongmin Li; Richard L Kravitz; James P Marcin; Patrick S Romano; David M Rocke; Timothy A Denton; Ralph G Brindis; Jian Dai; Ezra A Amsterdam
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.