Literature DB >> 12664457

Through the eye of the beholder: to seclude or not to seclude.

Dianne Wynaden1, Rose Chapman, Sunita McGowan, Colin Holmes, Pauline Ash, Antonius Boschman.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to provide new knowledge and understanding of the decision making used throughout the seclusion process. Seven mental health nurses and one doctor were each interviewed within 48 hours of making the decision to seclude a patient. The interviews were analysed using content analysis. This study provides valuable information regarding factors that are central to, and/or influence, the decision-making process surrounding seclusion. More importantly, the results demonstrate that seclusion is initiated only when all other less restrictive patient management strategies have proven to be unsuccessful with the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12664457     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0979.2002.00257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  3 in total

1.  Acceptability and use of coercive methods across differing service configurations with and without seclusion and/or psychiatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Sophie A Pettit; Len Bowers; Alex Tulloch; Alexis E Cullen; Lois Biggin Moylan; Faisil Sethi; Paul McCrone; John Baker; Alan Quirk; Duncan Stewart
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services-A systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Doedens; Jentien Vermeulen; Lindy-Lou Boyette; Corine Latour; Lieuwe de Haan
Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 3.  Enhancing psychological safety in mental health services.

Authors:  D F Hunt; J Bailey; B R Lennox; M Crofts; C Vincent
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2021-04-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.