Literature DB >> 12664130

Contrast-enhanced computed tomographic colonography in the follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: a feasibility study.

Andrea Laghi1, Riccardo Iannaccone, Emilio Bria, Iacopo Carbone, Luciana Trasatti, Francesca Piacentini, Salvatore Lauro, Aldo Vecchione, Roberto Passariello.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to assess whether contrast-enhanced CT colonography is a feasible alternative to both conventional colonoscopy and liver ultrasonography in the follow-up program of colorectal cancer patients. Thirty-five patients, surgically treated for colorectal cancer, underwent a follow-up program that included physical examination, carcinoembryonic antigen serum assay, conventional colonoscopy, liver ultrasonography, and chest X-ray. For these patients, we added a yearly contrast-enhanced CT colonography. All CT examinations were performed with a high-resolution protocol using a multidetector spiral CT scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) prior to and after the administration of 130 ml of i.v. contrast material. Images were directly analyzed on a dedicated workstation by two radiologists to determine colonic evaluation, visualization of colonic anastomosis, presence of polyps, and extra-colonic findings. Colonic evaluation was judged as optimal in 91.7% of all colonic segments. All mechanical surgical anastomoses were visualized with CT colonography. There was no evidence of anastomotic recurrence. Seven polyps were detected in five different patients with CT colonography, with two false-positive and no false-negative examinations. Three liver metastases and two basal pulmonary nodules were also identified. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography is a feasible alternative to both conventional colonoscopy and liver ultrasonography in the follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12664130     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1696-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  13 in total

1.  The virtuosity of virtuality or how real is virtual colonography.

Authors:  H Herfarth; A G Schreyer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Automated mass detection in contrast-enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast and volume.

Authors:  W Luboldt; C Tryon; M Kroll; T L Toussaint; K Holzer; N Hoepffner; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric P van der Stok; Manon C W Spaander; Dirk J Grünhagen; Cornelis Verhoef; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Optimal Surveillance Frequency After CRS/HIPEC for Appendiceal and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Multi-institutional Analysis of the US HIPEC Collaborative.

Authors:  Adriana C Gamboa; Mohammad Y Zaidi; Rachel M Lee; Shelby Speegle; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Joseph Lipscomb; Jordan M Cloyd; Ahmed Ahmed; Travis Grotz; Jennifer Leiting; Keith Fournier; Andrew J Lee; Sean Dineen; Benjamin D Powers; Andrew M Lowy; Nikhil V Kotha; Callisia Clarke; T Clark Gamblin; Sameer H Patel; Tiffany C Lee; Laura Lambert; Ryan J Hendrix; Daniel E Abbott; Kara Vande Walle; Kelly Lafaro; Byrne Lee; Fabian M Johnston; Jonathan Greer; Maria C Russell; Charles A Staley; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: emphasis on pre- and post-surgical evaluation.

Authors:  Nurhee Hong; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Phase- and size-adjusted CT cut-off for differentiating neoplastic lesions from normal colon in contrast-enhanced CT colonography.

Authors:  W Luboldt; M Kroll; A Wetter; T L Toussaint; N Hoepffner; K Holzer; A Kluge; T J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  CT colonography for surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy.

Authors:  François Porté; Mallikarjuna Uppara; George Malietzis; Omar Faiz; Steve Halligan; Thanos Athanasiou; David Burling
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population.

Authors:  Christiane A Kuehle; Jost Langhorst; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zoepf; Michael Nuefer; Florian Grabellus; Joerg Barkhausen; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography.

Authors:  Stefaan S Gryspeerdt; Murielle J Herman; Marc A Baekelandt; Bartel G van Holsbeeck; Philippe A Lefere
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.