OBJECTIVE: In the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), metformin significantly reduced the risk of diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes status was assessed by oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) performed while participants were still taking metformin or placebo. To determine whether the observed benefit was a transient pharmacological effect or more sustained, we performed a repeat OGTT after a short "washout" period during which medications (metformin or placebo) were withheld. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All participants assigned to medication who had not developed diabetes at the end of the DPP were asked to have a repeat OGTT after discontinuing the study medication for 1-2 weeks. The predesignated outcome was the odds of diabetes in metformin versus placebo comparisons during the trial and washout combined RESULTS: There were 1,274 participants who participated in the washout study and 529 who did not because they had already developed diabetes. Before the washout, the odds of diabetes in the metformin group was lower than that in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.82, P < 0.001). After the washout, diabetes was somewhat more frequently diagnosed in the metformin participants (1.49, 0.93-2.38, P = 0.098). Combining diabetes conversions during the DPP and during the washout, diabetes was diagnosed significantly less frequently in the metformin than the placebo group (0.75, 0.62-0.92, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The primary analysis of the DPP demonstrated that metformin decreased the risk of diabetes by 31%. The washout study shows that 26% of this effect can be accounted for by a pharmacological effect of metformin that did not persist when the drug was stopped. After the washout the incidence of diabetes was still reduced by 25%.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: In the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), metformin significantly reduced the risk of diabetes in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes status was assessed by oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) performed while participants were still taking metformin or placebo. To determine whether the observed benefit was a transient pharmacological effect or more sustained, we performed a repeat OGTT after a short "washout" period during which medications (metformin or placebo) were withheld. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: All participants assigned to medication who had not developed diabetes at the end of the DPP were asked to have a repeat OGTT after discontinuing the study medication for 1-2 weeks. The predesignated outcome was the odds of diabetes in metformin versus placebo comparisons during the trial and washout combined RESULTS: There were 1,274 participants who participated in the washout study and 529 who did not because they had already developed diabetes. Before the washout, the odds of diabetes in the metformin group was lower than that in the placebo group (odds ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.82, P < 0.001). After the washout, diabetes was somewhat more frequently diagnosed in the metforminparticipants (1.49, 0.93-2.38, P = 0.098). Combining diabetes conversions during the DPP and during the washout, diabetes was diagnosed significantly less frequently in the metformin than the placebo group (0.75, 0.62-0.92, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The primary analysis of the DPP demonstrated that metformin decreased the risk of diabetes by 31%. The washout study shows that 26% of this effect can be accounted for by a pharmacological effect of metformin that did not persist when the drug was stopped. After the washout the incidence of diabetes was still reduced by 25%.
Authors: R S Hundal; M Krssak; S Dufour; D Laurent; V Lebon; V Chandramouli; S E Inzucchi; W C Schumann; K F Petersen; B R Landau; G I Shulman Journal: Diabetes Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: William C Knowler; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Sarah E Fowler; Richard F Hamman; John M Lachin; Elizabeth A Walker; David M Nathan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vanita R Aroda; William C Knowler; Jill P Crandall; Leigh Perreault; Sharon L Edelstein; Susan L Jeffries; Mark E Molitch; Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Christine Darwin; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Marinella Temprosa; Steven E Kahn; David M Nathan Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Marc-Andre Cornier; Dana Dabelea; Teri L Hernandez; Rachel C Lindstrom; Amy J Steig; Nicole R Stob; Rachael E Van Pelt; Hong Wang; Robert H Eckel Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Jill P Crandall; William C Knowler; Steven E Kahn; David Marrero; Jose C Florez; George A Bray; Steven M Haffner; Mary Hoskin; David M Nathan Journal: Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-05-20
Authors: Timo Saaristo; Leena Moilanen; Eeva Korpi-Hyövälti; Mauno Vanhala; Juha Saltevo; Leo Niskanen; Jari Jokelainen; Markku Peltonen; Heikki Oksa; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Matti Uusitupa; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 19.112