Literature DB >> 12663180

Are mercury emissions from geologic sources significant? A status report.

Mae Sexauer Gustin1.   

Abstract

Geologic sources of atmospheric mercury include areas of fossil and current geothermal activity, recent volcanic activity, precious and base metal deposits, and organic rich sedimentary rocks. Early estimates of emissions from these sources were not based on measurements of mercury fluxes but implied based on the difference between emissions from anthropogenic point sources and wet/dry deposition estimates. In the past approximately 7 years significant progress has been made in development of methods for the measurement of mercury emissions, definition of those parameters most important in controlling emissions and scaling up emissions from natural source areas. This paper summarizes the work done on scaling of emissions from discrete areas of natural enrichment and from the State of Nevada, which is situated within a global belt of mercury enrichment. Preliminary data indicate that elemental mercury is the predominant (>95%) form of mercury being emitted from these sources. Scaling results suggest that the value used in early models to represent emissions from global mercuriferous belts is too low by at least three times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12663180     DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00565-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  11 in total

1.  New findings on evolution of metal homeostasis genes: evidence from comparative genome analysis of bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  J M Coombs; T Barkay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Distribution and variation of mercury in frozen soils of a high-altitude permafrost region on the northeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Shiwei Sun; Shichang Kang; Jie Huang; Shengyun Chen; Qianggong Zhang; Junming Guo; Wenjie Liu; Bigyan Neupane; Dahe Qin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mercury accumulation in soils and plants in the Almadén mining district, Spain: one of the most contaminated sites on Earth.

Authors:  José Antonio Molina; Roberto Oyarzun; José María Esbrí; Pablo Higueras
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Impact of gold mining associated with mercury contamination in soil, biota sediments and tailings in Kenya.

Authors:  Benjamin Okang' Odumo; Gregoria Carbonell; Hudson Kalambuka Angeyo; Jayanti Purshottam Patel; Manuel Torrijos; José Antonio Rodríguez Martín
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Mercury in the Mediterranean, part I: spatial and temporal trends.

Authors:  Jože Kotnik; Francesca Sprovieri; Nives Ogrinc; Milena Horvat; Nicola Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  New technique for quantification of elemental Hg in mine wastes and its implications for mercury evasion into the atmosphere.

Authors:  Adam D Jew; Christopher S Kim; James J Rytuba; Mae S Gustin; Gordon E Brown
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Sources, toxicity, and remediation of mercury: an essence review.

Authors:  Deep Raj; Subodh Kumar Maiti
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Spatial and temporal distribution of gaseous elemental mercury in Chongqing, China.

Authors:  Yongkui Yang; Hong Chen; Dingyong Wang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Volcanic mercury in Pinus canariensis.

Authors:  José Antonio Rodríguez Martín; Nikos Nanos; José Carlos Miranda; Gregoria Carbonell; Luis Gil
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-06-13

10.  Air Contamination by Mercury, Emissions and Transformations-a Review.

Authors:  Barbara Gworek; Wojciech Dmuchowski; Aneta H Baczewska; Paulina Brągoszewska; Olga Bemowska-Kałabun; Justyna Wrzosek-Jakubowska
Journal:  Water Air Soil Pollut       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.