Literature DB >> 12663129

Comparison of bone mineral density and body composition measurements in women obtained from two DXA instruments.

Sophie Gillette-Guyonnet1, Sandrine Andrieu, Fati Nourhashemi, Christelle Cantet, Hélène Grandjean, Bruno Vellas.   

Abstract

Information is lacking regarding the comparison of bone mineral and body composition measurements obtained from the different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems. The purpose of this study is to compare body composition and whole body bone mineral density (BMD) measurements from the hologic QDR-4500 W (DXA H) and the lunar (DXA L) systems. Seven women older than 40 years of age, were scanned on the same day by using DXA H and DXA L by the same observer. Measured total fat mass, percentage fat, whole body fat free soft tissue mass and BMD were similar between machines, but body mass was significantly higher with DXA L than with DXA H (P=0.0156). This was due to a higher bone mineral content obtained with DXA L. Agreement between the two DXA systems was quantified by using the Bland and Altman method. For each variable, all pairs of measurements were within the 95% confidence limits. These results suggested that we could use the two measurement methods interchangeably. However, due to the bone mineral inter-machine differences, comparisons of DXA measurements from different machines should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12663129     DOI: 10.1016/s0047-6374(02)00199-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev        ISSN: 0047-6374            Impact factor:   5.432


  14 in total

1.  Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.

Authors:  Nicola J Crabtree; N J Shaw; C M Boivin; B Oldroyd; J G Truscott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.

Authors:  J A Shepherd; B Fan; Y Lu; E M Lewiecki; P Miller; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Four-compartment cellular level body composition model: comparison of two approaches.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Marie-Pierre St-Onge; Angelo Pietrobelli; Jack Wang; ZiMian Wang; Stanley Heshka; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-01

4.  Body composition reference values in Singaporean adults using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-The Yishun study.

Authors:  BaoLin Pauline Soh; Shuen Yee Lee; Wai Yin Wong; Benedict Wei Jun Pang; Lay Khoon Lau; Khalid Abdul Jabbar; Wei Ting Seah; Kexun Kenneth Chen; Sivasubramanian Srinivasan; Tze Pin Ng; Shiou-Liang Wee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross-calibration study.

Authors:  Holly Hull; Qing He; John Thornton; Fahad Javed; Lynn Allen; Jack Wang; Richard N Pierson; Dympna Gallagher
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Association of a 7-year percent change in fat mass and muscle mass with subsequent cognitive dysfunction: the EPIDOS-Toulouse cohort.

Authors:  Gabor Abellan van Kan; Matteo Cesari; Sophie Gillette-Guyonnet; Charlotte Dupuy; Bruno Vellas; Yves Rolland
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  Implications of combined ovariectomy/multi-deficiency diet on rat bone with age-related variation in bone parameters and bone loss at multiple skeletal sites by DEXA.

Authors:  Parameswari Govindarajan; Gudrun Schlewitz; Nathalie Schliefke; David Weisweiler; Volker Alt; Ulrich Thormann; Katrin Susanne Lips; Sabine Wenisch; Alexander C Langheinrich; Daniel Zahner; Nasr Y Hemdan; Wolfgang Böcker; Reinhard Schnettler; Christian Heiss
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2013-02-28

8.  Effect of age and sex on jumping mechanography and other measures of muscle mass and function.

Authors:  E Siglinsky; D Krueger; R E Ward; P Caserotti; E S Strotmeyer; T B Harris; N Binkley; B Buehring
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Resulting Shifts in Percentile and Standard Placements after Comparison of the BOD POD and DXA.

Authors:  Timothy Heden; Steve Shepard; John Smith; Kay Covington; James Lecheminant
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2008-07-15

10.  A New Clinically Relevant T-Score Standard to Interpret Bone Status in a Sheep Model.

Authors:  Christian Heiss; Stefanie Kern; Deeksha Malhan; Wolfgang Böcker; Markus Engelhardt; Diaa Eldin S Daghma; Sabine Stoetzel; Jakob Schmitt; Matthias Ivo; Vivien Kauschke; Katrin S Lips; Kamen Tushtev; Kurosch Rezwan; Thaqif El Khassawna
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2017-10-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.