Literature DB >> 12661712

Collaborative testing to promote learning.

Marilyn Lusk1, Lynn Conklin.   

Abstract

This pilot study examined the adequacy of collaborative testing to test students' knowledge, as well as a teaching tool for critical thinking, collaboration, and test-taking ability. The results indicated students using collaborative testing for unit examinations scored equally well on a cumulative final examination as students who did not use collaborative testing. There were some indications that the test-taking skills of students using collaborative testing improved, producing more effective testing of knowledge. Finally, collaborative testing provided students with the opportunity to become more proficient with critical thinking and collaboration skills, and all students reported decreased test anxiety. Instructors desiring to provide more classroom opportunities for learning these valuable skills may want to consider using collaborative testing as a learning experience, as well as an effective testing method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12661712     DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-20030301-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Educ        ISSN: 0148-4834            Impact factor:   1.726


  8 in total

1.  Student attitudes, satisfaction, and learning in a collaborative testing environment.

Authors:  Christopher A Meseke; Rita Nafziger; Jamie K Meseke
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Effect of Collaborative vs. Noncollaborative Quizzes on Examination Scores in a Pharmaceutical Calculations Course.

Authors:  Stephanie Enz; Donald R Frosch
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Collaborative testing: the effect of group formation process on overall student performance.

Authors:  Rita Nafziger; Jamie K Meseke; Christopher A Meseke
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2011

4.  Requiring students to justify answer changes during collaborative testing may be necessary for improved academic performance.

Authors:  Niu Zhang; Charles N R Henderson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-02-03

5.  Students' Opinions on Summative Team Assessments in a Three-Year Concentrated Pharmacy Curriculum.

Authors:  Frederick R Tejada; Dana R Fasanella; Marwa Elfadaly
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance.

Authors:  James E Cooke; Laura Weir; Bridgette Clarkston
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.

Authors:  Hayley Leight; Cheston Saunders; Robin Calkins; Michelle Withers
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Effect of collaborative testing on learning and retention of course content in nursing students.

Authors:  Mozhgan Rivaz; Marzieh Momennasab; Paymaneh Shokrollahi
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2015-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.